Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Aug 25:9:47.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-9-47.

Quality of life as an outcome in Alzheimer's disease and other dementias--obstacles and goals

Affiliations

Quality of life as an outcome in Alzheimer's disease and other dementias--obstacles and goals

Matthias W Riepe et al. BMC Neurol. .

Abstract

Background: The number of individuals at risk for dementia will probably increase in ageing societies as will the array of preventive and therapeutic options, both however within limited economic resources. For economic and medical purposes valid instruments are required to assess disease processes and the efficacy of therapeutic interventions for different forms and stages of illness. In principal, the impact of illness and success of an intervention can be assessed with biomedical variables, e.g. severity of symptoms or frequency of complications of a disease. However, this does not allow clear judgement on clinical relevance or comparison across different diseases.

Discussion: Outcome model variables such as quality of life (QoL) or health care resource utilization require the patient to appraise their own well-being or third parties to set preferences. In Alzheimer's disease and other dementias the evaluation process performed by the patient is subject to the disease process itself because over progress of the disease neuroanatomical structures are affected that mediate evaluation processes.

Summary: Published research and methodological considerations thus lead to the conclusion that current QoL-instruments, which have been useful in other contexts, are ill-suited and insufficiently validated to play a major role in dementia research, decision making and resource allocation. New models integrating biomedical and outcome variables need to be developed in order to meet the upcoming medical and economic challenges.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Measures relevant for dementias.

References

    1. Vellas B, Andrieu S, Sampaio C, Wilcock G. Disease-modifying trials in Alzheimer's disease: a European task force consensus. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6:56–62. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70677-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Erkinjuntti T, Ostbye T, Steenhuis R, Hachinski V. The effect of different diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of dementia. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:1667–1674. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199712043372306. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hyman BT, Van Horsen GW, Damasio AR, Barnes CL. Alzheimer's disease: cell-specific pathology isolates the hippocampal formation. Science. 1984;225:1168–1170. doi: 10.1126/science.6474172. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hodges JR. Memory in the dementias. In: Tulving E, Craik FIM, editor. The Oxford Handbook of Memory. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press; 2000. pp. 441–459.
    1. Marshall JC, Fink GR. Spatial cognition: where we were and where we are. Neuroimage. 2001;14:S2–S7. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0834. - DOI - PubMed