Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009:5:677-91.
doi: 10.2147/vhrm.s4828. Epub 2009 Aug 20.

Selecting the optimal antithrombotic regimen for patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Affiliations
Review

Selecting the optimal antithrombotic regimen for patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Shailja V Parikh et al. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2009.

Abstract

The wide variety of anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents available for clinical use has made choosing the optimal antithrombotic regimen for patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention a complex task. While there is no single best regimen, from a risk-benefit ratio standpoint, particular regimens may be considered optimal for different patients. We review the mechanisms of action for the commonly prescribed antithrombotic medications, summarize pertinent data from randomized trials on their use in acute coronary syndromes, and provide an algorithm (incorporating data from these trials as well as risk assessment instruments) that will help guide the decision-making process.

Keywords: anticoagulant; antiplatelet; percutaneous coronary intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The TIMI, PURSUIT, and GRACE risk scores. Abbreviations: CAD, coronary artery disease; CCS, Canadian Cardiovascular Society; CHF, congestive heart failure; MI, myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Algorithm for selecting the optimal antithrombotic regimen incorporating cardiac risk, bleeding risk, and clopidogrel pretreatment. In this algorithm it is assumed that all patients have received aspirin. *If bivalirudin is used, a loading dose of clopidogrel should be given as soon as possible in the cardiac catheterization laboratory to decrease the risk of subacute stent thrombosis.

Similar articles

References

    1. Invasive compared with non-invasive treatment in unstable coronary-artery disease: FRISC II prospective randomised multicentre study FRagmin and Fast Revascularisation during InStability in Coronary artery disease Investigators. Lancet. 1999;354(9180):708–715. - PubMed
    1. Sabatine MS, Morrow DA, Giugliano RP, et al. Implications of upstream glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition and coronary artery stenting in the invasive management of unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a comparison of the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) IIIB trial and the Treat angina with Aggrastat and determine Cost of Therapy with Invasive or Conservative Strategy (TACTICS)-TIMI 18 trial. Circulation. 2004;109(7):874–880. - PubMed
    1. Fox KA, Poole-Wilson PA, Henderson RA, et al. Interventional versus conservative treatment for patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation RITA 3 randomised trial. Randomized Intervention Trial of unstable Angina. Lancet. 2002;360(9335):743–751. - PubMed
    1. Neumann FJ, Kastrati A, Pogatsa-Murray G, et al. Evaluation of prolonged antithrombotic pretreatment (“cooling-off ” strategy) before intervention in patients with unstable coronary syndromes: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003;290(12):1593–1599. - PubMed
    1. Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet. 2003;361(9351):13–20. - PubMed

MeSH terms