Selecting the optimal antithrombotic regimen for patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
- PMID: 19707287
- PMCID: PMC2731066
- DOI: 10.2147/vhrm.s4828
Selecting the optimal antithrombotic regimen for patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
Abstract
The wide variety of anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents available for clinical use has made choosing the optimal antithrombotic regimen for patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention a complex task. While there is no single best regimen, from a risk-benefit ratio standpoint, particular regimens may be considered optimal for different patients. We review the mechanisms of action for the commonly prescribed antithrombotic medications, summarize pertinent data from randomized trials on their use in acute coronary syndromes, and provide an algorithm (incorporating data from these trials as well as risk assessment instruments) that will help guide the decision-making process.
Keywords: anticoagulant; antiplatelet; percutaneous coronary intervention.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Algorithm for the management of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated proposal based on efficacy considerations.Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2020 Jul 1;6(3):197-198. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaa003. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2020. PMID: 31942967 No abstract available.
-
Antithrombotic strategies in patients on oral anticoagulant therapy undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a proposed algorithm based on individual risk stratification.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jan 1;75(1):128-34. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22200. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010. PMID: 19670304 Review.
-
Contra: 'Antithrombotic therapy with warfarin, aspirin and clopidogrel is the recommended regimen in anticoagulated patients who present with an acute coronary syndrome and/or undergo percutaneous coronary interventions'. Not for everybody.Thromb Haemost. 2008 Nov;100(5):754-5. Thromb Haemost. 2008. PMID: 18989516 No abstract available.
-
Rationale and use of antiplatelet and antithrombotic drugs during cardiovascular interventions: May 2010 update.EuroIntervention. 2010 May;6(1):39-45. EuroIntervention. 2010. PMID: 20542796 No abstract available.
-
Implications of bleeding in acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention.Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2011;7:551-67. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S23862. Epub 2011 Aug 26. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2011. PMID: 21915172 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Invasive compared with non-invasive treatment in unstable coronary-artery disease: FRISC II prospective randomised multicentre study FRagmin and Fast Revascularisation during InStability in Coronary artery disease Investigators. Lancet. 1999;354(9180):708–715. - PubMed
-
- Sabatine MS, Morrow DA, Giugliano RP, et al. Implications of upstream glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition and coronary artery stenting in the invasive management of unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a comparison of the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) IIIB trial and the Treat angina with Aggrastat and determine Cost of Therapy with Invasive or Conservative Strategy (TACTICS)-TIMI 18 trial. Circulation. 2004;109(7):874–880. - PubMed
-
- Fox KA, Poole-Wilson PA, Henderson RA, et al. Interventional versus conservative treatment for patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the British Heart Foundation RITA 3 randomised trial. Randomized Intervention Trial of unstable Angina. Lancet. 2002;360(9335):743–751. - PubMed
-
- Neumann FJ, Kastrati A, Pogatsa-Murray G, et al. Evaluation of prolonged antithrombotic pretreatment (“cooling-off ” strategy) before intervention in patients with unstable coronary syndromes: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003;290(12):1593–1599. - PubMed
-
- Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet. 2003;361(9351):13–20. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical