Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures
- PMID: 19710483
- PMCID: PMC3707303
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0901249
Exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation from medical imaging procedures
Abstract
Background: The growing use of imaging procedures in the United States has raised concerns about exposure to low-dose ionizing radiation in the general population.
Methods: We identified 952,420 nonelderly adults (between 18 and 64 years of age) in five health care markets across the United States between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2007. Utilization data were used to estimate cumulative effective doses of radiation from imaging procedures and to calculate population-based rates of exposure, with annual effective doses defined as low (< or = 3 mSv), moderate (> 3 to 20 mSv), high (> 20 to 50 mSv), or very high (> 50 mSv).
Results: During the study period, 655,613 enrollees (68.8%) underwent at least one imaging procedure associated with radiation exposure. The mean (+/-SD) cumulative effective dose from imaging procedures was 2.4+/-6.0 mSv per enrollee per year; however, a wide distribution was noted, with a median effective dose of 0.1 mSv per enrollee per year (interquartile range, 0.0 to 1.7). Overall, moderate effective doses of radiation were incurred in 193.8 enrollees per 1000 per year, whereas high and very high doses were incurred in 18.6 and 1.9 enrollees per 1000 per year, respectively. In general, cumulative effective doses of radiation from imaging procedures increased with advancing age and were higher in women than in men. Computed tomographic and nuclear imaging accounted for 75.4% of the cumulative effective dose, with 81.8% of the total administered in outpatient settings.
Conclusions: Imaging procedures are an important source of exposure to ionizing radiation in the United States and can result in high cumulative effective doses of radiation.
2009 Massachusetts Medical Society
Conflict of interest statement
No other potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported by any of the authors.
Figures
Comment in
-
Elements of danger--the case of medical imaging.N Engl J Med. 2009 Aug 27;361(9):841-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0904735. N Engl J Med. 2009. PMID: 19710480 No abstract available.
-
Radiation exposure from medical imaging procedures.N Engl J Med. 2009 Dec 3;361(23):2289; author reply 2291-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc0909579. N Engl J Med. 2009. PMID: 19955531 No abstract available.
-
Radiation exposure from medical imaging procedures.N Engl J Med. 2009 Dec 3;361(23):2290-1; author reply 2291-2. N Engl J Med. 2009. PMID: 19967791 No abstract available.
-
Radiation exposure from medical imaging procedures.N Engl J Med. 2009 Dec 3;361(23):2289-90; author reply 2291-2. N Engl J Med. 2009. PMID: 19967819 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Cumulative exposure to ionizing radiation from diagnostic and therapeutic cardiac imaging procedures: a population-based analysis.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Aug 24;56(9):702-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.05.014. Epub 2010 Jul 9. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010. PMID: 20619569 Free PMC article.
-
Use of medical imaging procedures with ionizing radiation in children: a population-based study.Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011 May;165(5):458-64. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.270. Epub 2011 Jan 3. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011. PMID: 21199972 Free PMC article.
-
Use of diagnostic imaging studies and associated radiation exposure for patients enrolled in large integrated health care systems, 1996-2010.JAMA. 2012 Jun 13;307(22):2400-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5960. JAMA. 2012. PMID: 22692172 Free PMC article.
-
Cancer risks from medical radiation.Health Phys. 2003 Jul;85(1):47-59. doi: 10.1097/00004032-200307000-00011. Health Phys. 2003. PMID: 12852471 Review.
-
Medical exposure to radiation and thyroid cancer.Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2011 May;23(4):244-50. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2011.01.159. Epub 2011 Feb 5. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2011. PMID: 21296564 Review.
Cited by
-
Leukocyte DNA damage after reduced and conventional absorbed radiation doses using 3rd generation dual-source CT technology.Eur J Radiol Open. 2016 Jul 6;3:134-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2016.06.001. eCollection 2016. Eur J Radiol Open. 2016. PMID: 27437433 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Low dose radiation induced senescence of human mesenchymal stromal cells and impaired the autophagy process.Oncotarget. 2015 Apr 10;6(10):8155-66. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2692. Oncotarget. 2015. PMID: 25544750 Free PMC article.
-
Trends of increasing medical radiation exposure in a population hospitalized for cardiovascular disease (1970-2009).PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e50168. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050168. Epub 2012 Nov 28. PLoS One. 2012. PMID: 23209665 Free PMC article.
-
Novel X-ray imaging technology enables significant patient dose reduction in interventional cardiology while maintaining diagnostic image quality.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Nov;86(5):E205-12. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25913. Epub 2015 Mar 30. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015. PMID: 25754018 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Coronary artery calcium score: Re-evaluation of its predictive value for coronary artery disease.World J Cardiol. 2012 Oct 26;4(10):284-7. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v4.i10.284. World J Cardiol. 2012. PMID: 23110244 Free PMC article.
References
-
- National Research Council. Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII - Phase 2. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006. - PubMed
-
- The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37:1–332. - PubMed
-
- Wrixon AD. New ICRP recommendations. J Radiol Prot. 2008;28:161–8. - PubMed
-
- Bhargavan M, Sunshine JH. Utilization of radiology services in the United States: levels and trends in modalities, regions, and populations. Radiology. 2005;234:824–32. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical