Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1990 Mar;23(2):102-6.
doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1014491.

Double blind, controlled study of the efficacy and safety of alpidem in the treatment of anxiety in schizophrenic in-patients

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Double blind, controlled study of the efficacy and safety of alpidem in the treatment of anxiety in schizophrenic in-patients

M G Minervini et al. Pharmacopsychiatry. 1990 Mar.

Abstract

In this double-blind study, alpidem, a new imidazo-pyridine anxiolytic drug, was compared with placebo in order to test its efficacy and safety in chronic schizophrenic in-patients suffering from anxiety not directly related to the schizophrenic process. Sixty-six patients aged from 18 to 65 entered the trial. They also scored at least 18 on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HRSA) after a seven-day placebo run-in. Improvement in symptoms was evaluated by means of the HRSA, the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and the Clinical Global Impression score (CGI). Thirty-three patients were randomly allocated to alpidem and 33 to placebo. Alpidem was significantly more effective (P less than 0.0001) than placebo in improving HRSA scores (total score and factorial scores for somatic and psychic anxiety), BPRS, and VAS. Considering the results of CGI at 21 day, more patients were moderately to markedly improved on alpidem (30/33) than on placebo (2/33) (P less than 0.0001). The efficacy index, according to CGI, was significantly better (P less than 0.001 at least) for alpidem than for placebo. Side-effects were negligible in both groups.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms