Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Nov-Dec;123(6):781-9.
doi: 10.1177/003335490812300614.

Process evaluation of an in-school anti-tobacco media campaign in Louisiana

Affiliations

Process evaluation of an in-school anti-tobacco media campaign in Louisiana

Traci Hong et al. Public Health Rep. 2008 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: In light of challenges imposed by the changing media landscape and decreasing classroom time available for health interventions, new approaches are needed to disseminate anti-tobacco messages to adolescents. This study reported process evaluation of an in-school three-year anti-tobacco media campaign conducted in 10 schools in Louisiana.

Methods: Over three years, 10 schools received an in-school anti-tobacco media campaign. The media campaign was one intervention component of the Acadiana Coalition of Teens against Tobacco. Campaign measures were tracked over the campaign's three-year duration. The campaign and evaluation were designed to target the students as they progressed through high school. The number of students who completed the surveys were 1,823 in Year 1, 1,552 in Year 2, and 1,390 in Year 3. Schools eligible for participation were publicly funded schools with no magnet or special populations and within a two-hour driving distance of the New Orleans study office.

Results: In a self-report survey (Year 1, n = 1,823; Year 2, n = 1,552; Year 3, n = 1,390), more than 75% and 50% of students reported being exposed to posters and public service announcements, respectively. Recognition of campaign theme was more than 80%. Almost half of respondents reported that the posters were interesting, one-third reported that the posters prevented them from smoking, and 10% reported that the posters encouraged them to cease smoking. Stock media posters had a significantly higher affective reaction than the customized media posters.

Conclusion: Findings suggest that in-school media programs are useful and should be considered as a viable approach to health education for adolescents.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Stock poster from Year 1 of anti-tobacco campaign
Figure 2
Figure 2. Custom low-budget poster from Year 3 of anti-tobacco campaign
Figure 3
Figure 3. Custom high-budget poster from Year 2 of anti-tobacco campaign
Figure 4
Figure 4. Proportion of students reporting exposure to posters and PSAs and recognition of theme for each campaign year
PSA = public service announcement
Figure 5
Figure 5. Proportion of campaign impact variables reported for each campaign year

References

    1. Johnston LD, Terry-McEllrath YM, O'Malley PM, Wakefield M. Trends in recall and appraisal of anti-smoking advertising among American youth: national survey results, 1997–2001. Prev Sci. 2005;6:1–19. - PubMed
    1. Pechmann C. Does antismoking advertising combat underage smoking? A review of past practices and research. In: Goldberg ME, Fishbein M, Middlestadt S, editors. Social marketing: theoretical and practical perspectives. 189–216. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1997.
    1. Wakefield M, Szczypka G, Terry-McElrath Y, Emery S, Flay B, Chaloupka F, et al. Mixed messages on tobacco: comparative exposure to public health, tobacco company- and pharmaceutical company-sponsored tobacco-related television campaigns in the United States, 1999–2003. Addiction. 2005;100:1875–83. - PubMed
    1. Sepe E, Ling PM, Glantz SA. Smooth moves: bar and nightclub tobacco promotions that target young adults. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:414–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hong T, Cody MJ. Presence of pro-tobacco messages on the Web. J Health Comm. 2002;7:273–307. - PubMed

Publication types