Tc-99m methylene diphosphonate versus Tc-99m pyrophosphate: biologic and clinical comparison
- PMID: 197133
Tc-99m methylene diphosphonate versus Tc-99m pyrophosphate: biologic and clinical comparison
Abstract
The biologic and imaging characteristics of Tc-99m MDP and Tc-99m PPi were compared in animals and patients using freeze-dried bone-imaging kits. Biodistribution data in rabbits showed Tc-99m MDP had slightly higher bone uptake, significantly lower blood levels, and faster urinary excretion compared with Tc-99m PPi. Duplicate studies performed on ten patients showed the following: (a) blood clearance of Tc-99m MDP was more prompt and complete, resulting in significantly lower blood levels at 4 hr; (b) urinary excretion was greater with Tc-99m MDP than with Tc-99m PPi; and (c) Tc-99m PPi showed significant red-cell labeling, whereas Tc-99m MDP did not. Image quality was generally better with Tc-99m MDP than with Tc-99 m PPi, although there was no obvious difference in diagnostic sensitivity between the two agents.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of Tc-99m methylene diphosphonate with Tc-99m pyrophosphate in the detection of acute myocardial infarction: concise communication.J Nucl Med. 1977 Aug;18(8):790-2. J Nucl Med. 1977. PMID: 194934
-
Technetium-99m-methylene diphosphonate--a superior agent for skeletal imaging: comparison with other technetium complexes.J Nucl Med. 1975 Aug;16(8):744-55. J Nucl Med. 1975. PMID: 170385
-
Is (99m)Tc-labelled pamidronate a better agent than (99m)Tc-medronate for bone imaging?Nucl Med Commun. 2007 Feb;28(2):101-7. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e328013eb74. Nucl Med Commun. 2007. PMID: 17198350
-
Technetium-99m labeled agents for skeletal imaging.CRC Crit Rev Clin Radiol Nucl Med. 1976;8(1):1-31. CRC Crit Rev Clin Radiol Nucl Med. 1976. PMID: 789010 Review.
-
Quantitative studies of bone using (99m)Tc-methylene diphosphonate skeletal plasma clearance.Semin Nucl Med. 2009 Nov;39(6):369-79. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2009.05.001. Semin Nucl Med. 2009. PMID: 19801217 Review.
Cited by
-
The clinical comparison of skeletal imaging agents.Eur J Nucl Med. 1980 Jun;5(3):257-60. doi: 10.1007/BF00271908. Eur J Nucl Med. 1980. PMID: 6771137 Clinical Trial.
-
Biodistribution of anionic separated MDP complexes from different MDP preparations.Eur J Nucl Med. 1989;15(9):609-11. doi: 10.1007/BF00256939. Eur J Nucl Med. 1989. PMID: 2598957
-
Estimation of parameters affecting the uptake of 99mTc-methylenediphosphonate in rat femur with model simulation.Eur J Nucl Med. 1985;10(1-2):63-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00261766. Eur J Nucl Med. 1985. PMID: 3156741
-
Soft-tissue uptake of 99mTc-diphosphonate and 99mTc-pyrophosphate in amyloidosis.Eur J Nucl Med. 1990;16(8-10):663-70. doi: 10.1007/BF00998166. Eur J Nucl Med. 1990. PMID: 2166666
-
Normal Skeletal Standardized Uptake Values Obtained from Quantitative Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography: Time-Dependent Study on Breast Cancer Patients.Indian J Nucl Med. 2021 Oct-Dec;36(4):398-411. doi: 10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_47_21. Epub 2021 Dec 15. Indian J Nucl Med. 2021. PMID: 35125758 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources