Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Sep 16;101(18):1280-3.
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp262. Epub 2009 Aug 27.

Contemporary risk profile of prostate cancer in the United States

Affiliations

Contemporary risk profile of prostate cancer in the United States

Yu-Hsuan Shao et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. .

Abstract

National-level data that characterize contemporary prostate cancer patients are limited. We used 2004-2005 data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program to generate a contemporary profile of prostate cancer patients (N = 82 541) and compared patient characteristics of this 2004-2005 population with those of patients diagnosed in 1998-1989 and 1996-1997. Among newly diagnosed patients in 2004-2005, the majority (94%) had localized (ie, stage T1 or T2) prostate cancer and a median serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 6.7 ng/mL. Between 1988-1989 and 2004-2005, the average age at prostate cancer diagnosis decreased from 72.2 to 67.2 years, and the incidence rate of T3 or T4 cancer decreased from 52.7 per 100 000 to 7.9 per 100 000 among whites and from 90.9 per 100 000 to 13.3 per 100 000 among blacks. In 2004-2005, compared with whites, blacks were more likely to be diagnosed at a younger age (mean age: 64.7 vs 67.5 years, difference = 2.7 years, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.5 to 2.9 years, P < .001) and to have a higher PSA level at diagnosis (median PSA level: 7.4 vs 6.6 ng/mL, difference = 0.8 ng/mL, 95% CI = 0.6 to 1.0 ng/mL, P < .001). In conclusion, more men were diagnosed with prostate cancer at a younger age and earlier stage in 2004-2005 than in earlier years. The racial disparity in cancer stage at diagnosis has decreased statistically significantly over time.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient risk stratification by age at diagnosis and race. Patients were categorized into three risk groups on the basis of clinical stage, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, and Gleason score as previously described (10). Low risk = stage T2a or lower, PSA level ≤10 ng/mL, and a Gleason score ≤ 6; intermediate risk = stage T2b or Gleason score 7 or a PSA level >10 and ≤20 ng/mL; and high risk = stage T2c or higher or PSA level >20 ng/mL or Gleason score ≥8. All categories do not total 100% because of rounding.

References

    1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58(2):71–96. - PubMed
    1. Cooperberg MR, Broering JM, Kantoff PW, et al. Contemporary trends in low risk prostate cancer: risk assessment and treatment. J Urol. 2007;178(3, pt 2):S14–S19. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nguyen CT, Reuther AM, Stephenson AJ, et al. The specific definition of high risk prostate cancer has minimal impact on biochemical relapse-free survival. J Urol. 2008;181(1):75–80. - PubMed
    1. Jani AB, Johnstone PA, Liauw SL, et al. Age and grade trends in prostate cancer (1974–2003): a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Registry analysis. Am J Clin Oncol. 2008;31(4):375–378. - PubMed
    1. Cooperberg MR, Lubeck DP, Meng MV, et al. The changing face of low-risk prostate cancer: trends in clinical presentation and primary management. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(11):2141–2149. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances