External-beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer in Osaka, Japan, 1995-2006: time trends, outcome, and risk stratification
- PMID: 19714306
- DOI: 10.1007/s00066-009-1981-0
External-beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer in Osaka, Japan, 1995-2006: time trends, outcome, and risk stratification
Abstract
Purpose: To establish an initial database of external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for clinically localized prostate cancer used in Osaka, Japan, and, by analyzing the results of the Osaka multicenter cooperative study, to determine time trends, outcome, and applicability of existing and the authors' original risk stratification methods.
Patients and methods: Data of 652 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer (T1-4 N0 M0) were accrued from July to December 2007. These patients had been treated from 1995 through 2006 with consecutive definitive EBRT of > or = 60 Gy at eleven institutions, mainly in Osaka. Altogether, 436 patients were eligible for analysis using several risk stratification methods, namely, those of D'Amico et al., the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), and Seattle, as well as the authors' original Prostate Cancer Risk Index (PRIX).
Results: The number of patients showed a tenfold increase over 10 years, together with a rapid spread of the use of Gleason Score from 0% to > 90% of cases. The dominant RT dose fractionation was 70 Gy/35 fractions (87%). Hormone therapy had been administered to 95% of the patients and the higher PRIX corresponded to the higher rate of hormone usage. 3- and 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS) rates were 85% and 70%, respectively. The D'Amico (p = 0.132), NCCN (p = 0.138), Seattle (p = 0.041) and PRIX (p = 0.044) classifications showed weak or no correlation with bRFS, while the own modified three-class PRIX (PRIX 0, 1-5, 6) showed a strong correlation (p = 0.002).
Conclusion: The use of prostate EBRT in Japan is still in its infancy, but is rapidly expanding. The short-term outcomes have been satisfactory considering the moderate RT dose. A very high rate of hormone usage may affect the outcome favorably, but also may compromise the usefulness of current risk stratification.
Similar articles
-
Prostate Risk Index (PRIX) as a new method of risk classification for clinically localized prostate cancer.Strahlenther Onkol. 2007 Sep;183(9):490-6. doi: 10.1007/s00066-007-1692-3. Strahlenther Onkol. 2007. PMID: 17762923
-
Radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy <72 Gy, external beam radiotherapy > or =72 Gy, permanent seed implantation, or combined seeds/external beam radiotherapy for stage T1-T2 prostate cancer.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Jan 1;58(1):25-33. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(03)00784-3. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004. PMID: 14697417
-
Role of novel risk classification method, Prostate Cancer Risk Index (PRIX) for clinically localized prostate cancer after high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy as monotherapy.Anticancer Res. 2014 Jun;34(6):3077-81. Anticancer Res. 2014. PMID: 24922676
-
Dose escalated external beam radiotherapy versus neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy and conventional dose external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: do we need both?Strahlenther Onkol. 2007 Dec;183 Spec No 2:26-8. doi: 10.1007/s00066-007-2011-8. Strahlenther Onkol. 2007. PMID: 18167004 Review.
-
Preliminary toxicity and prostate-specific antigen response of a Phase I/II trial of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, 103Pd brachytherapy, and three-dimensional conformal external beam irradiation in the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer.Brachytherapy. 2002;1(1):2-10. doi: 10.1016/s1538-4721(02)00006-5. Brachytherapy. 2002. PMID: 15062181 Review.
Cited by
-
An overview of prostate diseases and their characteristics specific to Asian men.Asian J Androl. 2012 May;14(3):458-64. doi: 10.1038/aja.2010.137. Epub 2012 Feb 6. Asian J Androl. 2012. PMID: 22306914 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Variability in bladder volumes of full bladders in definitive radiotherapy for cases of localized prostate cancer.Strahlenther Onkol. 2010 Nov;186(11):637-42. doi: 10.1007/s00066-010-2105-6. Epub 2010 Nov 8. Strahlenther Onkol. 2010. PMID: 21069269
-
The evolution of brachytherapy for prostate cancer.Nat Rev Urol. 2017 Jun 30;14(7):415-439. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2017.76. Nat Rev Urol. 2017. PMID: 28664931 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prostate cancer radiotherapy in Austria: overview on number of patients, intention to treat, and treatment techniques based on data from 2007.Strahlenther Onkol. 2011 May;187(5):279-83. doi: 10.1007/s00066-011-2268-9. Epub 2011 Apr 26. Strahlenther Onkol. 2011. PMID: 21533756
-
Analysis of late toxicity associated with external beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer with uniform setting of classical 4-field 70 Gy in 35 fractions: a survey study by the Osaka Urological Tumor Radiotherapy Study Group.J Radiat Res. 2013 Jan;54(1):113-25. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrs083. Epub 2012 Sep 17. J Radiat Res. 2013. PMID: 22988284 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials