Behavioral family counseling for substance abuse: a treatment development pilot study
- PMID: 19717243
- PMCID: PMC2791374
- DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2009.07.003
Behavioral family counseling for substance abuse: a treatment development pilot study
Abstract
Substance-dependent patients (N=29) living with a family member other than a spouse were randomly assigned to equally intensive treatments consisting of either (a) Behavioral Family Counseling (BFC) plus Individual-Based Treatment (IBT) or (b) IBT alone. Outcome data were collected at baseline, post-treatment, and at 3- and 6-month follow-up. BFC patients remained in treatment significantly longer than IBT patients. BFC patients improved significantly from baseline at all time periods on all outcomes studied, and had a medium effect size reflecting better primary outcomes of increased abstinence and reduced substance use than IBT patients. For secondary outcomes of reduced negative consequences and improved relationship adjustment, both BFC and IBT patients improved significantly and to an equivalent extent. The present results show BFC is a promising method for retaining patients in treatment, increasing abstinence, and reducing substance use. These results also provide support for larger scale, randomized trials examining the efficacy of behavioral family counseling for patients living with family members beyond spouses.
Figures
References
-
- American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th. Washington, DC: 1994. Author.
-
- Azrin NH, Naster BJ, Jones R. Reciprocity counseling: A rapid learning-based procedure for marital counseling. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 1973;11:365–382. - PubMed
-
- Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the social sciences. 2nd. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988.
-
- Elashoff JD. n-Query advisor release 2.0: Study planning software. Cork, Ireland: Statistical Solutions; 1997.
-
- Epstein EE, McCrady BS. Behavioral couples treatment of alcohol and drug use disorders: Current status and innovations. Clinical Psychology Review. 1998;18:689–711. - PubMed
