Decision making in patient-initiated elective cesarean delivery: the influence of birth stories
- PMID: 19720338
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2008.12.014
Decision making in patient-initiated elective cesarean delivery: the influence of birth stories
Abstract
Patient-initiated elective cesarean delivery is emerging as an urgent issue for practitioners, hospitals, and policy makers and for pregnant women. This exploratory qualitative study looks at the birth stories and cultural knowledge that women use to inform the decision about an elective cesarean without medical indication. Data collection consisted of exploratory qualitative in-depth interviews with 17 primiparous women in British Columbia, Canada. Interviews revealed the influence of socially circulated birth stories and cultural narratives on their attitudes towards mode of delivery. Participants included in their decision making process both medical information and informal birth stories that were technologically inclined and confirmed their preference for cesarean delivery. Results indicate that women who participated in this study drew heavily from social and cultural knowledge in forming their decision to give birth by patient-initiated elective cesarean delivery. Although the numbers of women who request a cesarean delivery for social reasons is still small, the persuasive influence on parturient women of positive cesarean stories and negative vaginal stories must be considered. Care providers and childbirth educators need to become familiar with the social influences impacting women's decisions for mode of delivery so that truly informed choice discussions can be undertaken.
Similar articles
-
Impact of first childbirth on changes in women's preference for mode of delivery: follow-up of a longitudinal observational study.Birth. 2008 Jun;35(2):121-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00225.x. Birth. 2008. PMID: 18507583
-
Influences on decision making among primiparous women choosing elective caesarean section in the absence of medical indications: findings from a qualitative investigation.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010 Oct;32(10):962-9. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)34684-9. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2010. PMID: 21176305
-
How did you choose a mode of birth? Experiences of nulliparous women from Turkey.Women Birth. 2016 Aug;29(4):359-67. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2016.01.005. Epub 2016 Feb 2. Women Birth. 2016. PMID: 26846560
-
A critique of the literature on women's request for cesarean section.Birth. 2007 Dec;34(4):331-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00193.x. Birth. 2007. PMID: 18021149 Review.
-
Women's request for a cesarean section: a critique of the literature.Birth. 2000 Dec;27(4):256-63. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2000.00256.x. Birth. 2000. PMID: 11251511 Review.
Cited by
-
Attitude of primiparous women towards their preference for delivery method: a qualitative content analysis.Arch Public Health. 2019 Aug 20;77:38. doi: 10.1186/s13690-019-0364-y. eCollection 2019. Arch Public Health. 2019. PMID: 31452882 Free PMC article.
-
Constructing the uncertainty of due dates.Health Commun. 2014;29(9):866-76. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2013.809501. Epub 2013 Nov 22. Health Commun. 2014. PMID: 24266788 Free PMC article.
-
Do women prefer caesarean sections? A qualitative evidence synthesis of their views and experiences.PLoS One. 2021 May 5;16(5):e0251072. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251072. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33951101 Free PMC article.
-
How do informal information sources influence women's decision-making for birth? A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jan 10;18(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1648-2. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018. PMID: 29316887 Free PMC article.
-
Fear, Risk, and the Responsible Choice: Risk Narratives and Lowering the Rate of Caesarean Sections in High-income Countries.AIMS Public Health. 2017 Dec 26;4(6):615-632. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2017.6.615. eCollection 2017. AIMS Public Health. 2017. PMID: 30155505 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical