Evidence for the use of a numerical rating scale to assess the intensity of pediatric pain
- PMID: 19726211
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.07.002
Evidence for the use of a numerical rating scale to assess the intensity of pediatric pain
Abstract
The aim of this work was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Numerical Rating Scale-11 (NRS-11) when used to assess pediatric pain intensity. We performed two studies: 175 schoolchildren, aged 8-12, participated in Study 1 and 63 children undergoing surgery and aged 6-16, participated in Study 2. The NRS-11 showed (a) adequate convergent construct validity when correlated with the Faces Pain Scale - Revised (FPS-R; r(1)=0.78, r(2)=0.93); (b) adequate discriminant validity in relation to measures of pain-related affect (z(1)=3.55, z(2)=7.62) and disability (z(1)=7.62, z(2)=6.83); and (c) adequate criterion-related validity using measures of pain-related affect (r(1)=.58, r(2)=.66), disability (r(1)=0.22, r(2)=.39), and quality of life (r(2)=-.46). Schoolchildren were asked whether they preferred using the NRS-11 or the FPS-R when reporting the intensity of their pain. While both sexes and both the younger and older age groups preferred the FPS-R, this preference was more marked among girls and younger children. The NRS-11 has shown an acceptable level of validity for assessing pain intensity in both samples, however, additional research is needed in order to fully clarify the lower age limit in which the NRS-11 can be used.
Comment in
-
Numerical rating scale for self-report of pain intensity in children and adolescents: recent progress and further questions.Eur J Pain. 2009 Nov;13(10):1005-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.08.006. Epub 2009 Sep 17. Eur J Pain. 2009. PMID: 19766028 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of reliability, validity, and preference for a pediatric pain intensity scale: the Catalan version of the faces pain scale--revised.Pain. 2004 Sep;111(1-2):59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.05.023. Pain. 2004. PMID: 15327809
-
Postoperative pain intensity assessment: a comparison of four scales in Chinese adults.Pain Med. 2007 Apr;8(3):223-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2007.00296.x. Pain Med. 2007. PMID: 17371409
-
Reliability and validity of the Faces Pain Scale with older adults.Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 May;43(4):447-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.01.001. Epub 2006 Feb 28. Int J Nurs Stud. 2006. PMID: 16510146
-
Recommendations for selection of self-report pain intensity measures in children and adolescents: a systematic review and quality assessment of measurement properties.Pain. 2019 Jan;160(1):5-18. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001377. Pain. 2019. PMID: 30180088
-
[The assessment of pain intensity using one-dimensional scales].Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2013;107(4-5):279-84. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2013.05.008. Epub 2013 Jun 28. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2013. PMID: 23916265 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Patient-reported outcomes of pain and physical functioning in neurofibromatosis clinical trials.Neurology. 2016 Aug 16;87(7 Suppl 1):S4-S12. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002927. Neurology. 2016. PMID: 27527648 Free PMC article.
-
Risk and Resilience in Pediatric Pain: The Roles of Parent and Adolescent Catastrophizing and Acceptance.Clin J Pain. 2018 Dec;34(12):1096-1105. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000639. Clin J Pain. 2018. PMID: 30028367 Free PMC article.
-
Conservative care with or without manipulative therapy in the management of back and/or neck pain in Danish children aged 9-15: a randomised controlled trial nested in a school-based cohort.BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 10;8(9):e021358. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021358. BMJ Open. 2018. PMID: 30206079 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Do Commonly Used Measures of Pain Intensity Only Reflect Pain Intensity in Youths With Bothersome Pain and a Physical Disability?Front Pediatr. 2019 Jun 20;7:229. doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00229. eCollection 2019. Front Pediatr. 2019. PMID: 31281805 Free PMC article.
-
Conditioned pain modulation and situational pain catastrophizing as preoperative predictors of pain following chest wall surgery: a prospective observational cohort study.PLoS One. 2014 Feb 26;9(2):e90185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090185. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 24587268 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous