Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Jan;38(1):138-44.
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b788ab.

Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase is a novel biomarker in humans for severe traumatic brain injury

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase is a novel biomarker in humans for severe traumatic brain injury

Linda Papa et al. Crit Care Med. 2010 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: Ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase (UCH-L1), also called neuronal-specific protein gene product (PGP 9.3), is highly abundant in neurons. To assess the reliability of UCH-L1 as a potential biomarker for traumatic brain injury (TBI) this study compared cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of UCH-L1 from adult patients with severe TBI to uninjured controls; and examined the relationship between levels with severity of injury, complications and functional outcome.

Design: This study was designed as prospective case control study.

Patients: This study enrolled 66 patients, 41 with severe TBI, defined by a Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score of < or =8, who underwent intraventricular intracranial pressure monitoring and 25 controls without TBI requiring CSF drainage for other medical reasons.

Setting: : Two hospital system level I trauma centers.

Measurements and main results: Ventricular CSF was sampled from each patient at 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, 144, and 168 hrs following TBI and analyzed for UCH-L1. Injury severity was assessed by the GCS score, Marshall Classification on computed tomography and a complicated postinjury course. Mortality was assessed at 6 wks and long-term outcome was assessed using the Glasgow outcome score 6 months after injury. TBI patients had significantly elevated CSF levels of UCH-L1 at each time point after injury compared to uninjured controls. Overall mean levels of UCH-L1 in TBI patients was 44.2 ng/mL (+/-7.9) compared with 2.7 ng/mL (+/-0.7) in controls (p <.001). There were significantly higher levels of UCH-L1 in patients with a lower GCS score at 24 hrs, in those with postinjury complications, in those with 6-wk mortality, and in those with a poor 6-month dichotomized Glasgow outcome score.

Conclusions: These data suggest that this novel biomarker has the potential to determine injury severity in TBI patients. Further studies are needed to validate these findings in a larger sample.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Drs. Papa, Hayes, and Wang are consultants for Banyan Biomarkers. The remaining authors have not disclosed any potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of cerebrospinal fluid levels of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase (UCH-L1) in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) vs. control at all time points. Levels of UCH-L1 were predominantly elevated in the first 24 hrs after injury compared with control patients for each time point (n = 9, 10, 20, 26, 35, 32, 15, 22, 12, 18, respectively) (*p ≤ .05 compared with control). Values represent means (ng/mL ± SEM).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of levels of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase (UCH-L1) in patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score 3–5 and GCS score 6 – 8 in the first 24 hrs after injury: Mean levels of UCH-L1 (ng/mL ± SEM). Mean 12- and 24-hr levels of UCH-L1 in cerebrospinal fluid are significantly elevated in patients with GCS 3–5 (n = 5, 8) compared with those with a GCS 6 – 8 (n = 20, 21) at day 1 after injury.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Overall mean levels of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase (UCH-L1) and the Marshall classification on admission computed tomography (CT) scan. There were no significant differences in levels of UCH-L1 between the Marshall classes (n = 1, 15, 4, 14, 2, respectively). There were no patients in the class IV group. The overall mean level of UCH-L1 in the evacuated mass lesion (V-EM) group vs. the nonevacuated mass lesion (VI-NEM) group was 28.3 (±6.1) and 113.6 (±104.8), respectively (p = .43).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Comparison of levels of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase (UCH-L1) measured at all time points after injury in patients with and without a complicated postinjury course. In patients with a complicated postinjury course, levels of UCH-L1 were significantly elevated at 24, 48, and 72 hrs after injury (p = .033, p = .004 and p = .045, respectively) compared with those without a complicated course. The number of patients without a complicated postinjury course at each time point was n = 0, 8, 7, 7, 5, 3, 2, 2, and those with a complicated course n = 2, 8, 11, 14, 12, 9, 10, 9, respectively.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Comparison of levels of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase (UCH-L1) in cerebrospinal fluid 24 hrs after injury in patients with who survived to 6 wks vs. nonsurvivors. Patients who did not survive for 6 wks had significantly higher values (mean ± SEM) of UCH-L1 in cerebrospinal fluid at 24 hrs after injury when compared with patients who survived (p = .010) (n = 6, 23, respectively).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Comparison of levels of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase (UCH-L1) in cerebrospinal fluid at 96, 120, and 168 hrs after injury in patients with poor outcome vs. good outcome at 6 months. Patients with poor outcome had significantly higher values (mean ± SEM) of UCH-L1 at 96 and 168 hrs after injury when compared with patients with good outcome (p = .05 and p = .032, respectively). UCH-L1 levels drawn at 120 hrs showed a similar trend, but values were not statistically significant (p = .08). The number of patients with good outcome at the respective time points was n = 3, 3, 3 and those with a poor outcome n = 7, 15, 9. GOS, Glasgow Outcome Scale.

Comment in

References

    1. Consensus conference. Rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injury. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Rehabilitation of Persons With Traumatic Brain Injury. JAMA. 1999;282:974–983. - PubMed
    1. Narayan RK, Michel ME, Ansell B, et al. Clinical trials in head injury. J Neurotrauma. 2002;19:503–557. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Saatman KE, Duhaime AC, Bullock R, et al. Classification of traumatic brain injury for targeted therapies. J Neurotrauma. 2008;25:719–738. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Doppenberg EM, Choi SC, Bullock R. Clinical trials in traumatic brain injury: Lessons for the future. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2004;16:87–94. - PubMed
    1. Pineda JA, Wang KK, Hayes RL. Biomarkers of proteolytic damage following traumatic brain injury. Brain Pathol. 2004;14:202–209. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms