Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Feb;52(2):75-82.
doi: 10.1007/s00234-009-0589-5. Epub 2009 Sep 2.

Carotid artery wall thickness: comparison between sonography and multi-detector row CT angiography

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Carotid artery wall thickness: comparison between sonography and multi-detector row CT angiography

Luca Saba et al. Neuroradiology. 2010 Feb.

Abstract

Introduction: Prospective studies have shown that an increased thickness of the carotid wall is a significant predictor of coronary and cerebrovascular complications. Our purpose was to assess the agreement between multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) angiography (MDCTA) and colour Doppler ultrasound (CD-US) in measuring carotid artery wall thickness (CAWT) and the intima-media thickness (IMT).

Methods: Altogether, 97 subjects (age range 64-84 years) were prospectively analysed using a four-detector row CT and a sonographic scanner. In total, 46 subjects had shown cerebral ischaemic symptoms. CAWT and IMT were measured in each patient using MDCTA and CD-US (by applying a digital calliper), respectively. Continuous data were described as the mean value +/- standard deviation and were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. A p value <0.05 was considered significant. Bland-Altman statistics was employed to measure the agreement between MDCTA and CD-US.

Results: CAWT ranged from 0.5 to 1.53 mm, with a mean value of 0.9072 mm. IMT ranged from 0.46 to 1.5 mm, with a mean value of 0.8839 mm. By analysing the Bland-Altman plot, we observed an excellent agreement between CD-US and MDCTA with a bias between methods of 0.023 +/- 0.0424 mm. A limit of agreement from -0.06 to 0.106 was recorded. Correlation coefficient r was 0.9855 (95% confidence interval 0.9808-0.989). Mann-Whitney U test indicated a p value of 0.377.

Conclusions: Obtained results indicated a significant agreement between MDCTA and CD-US in the measurement of CAWT and IMT.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Stroke. 1997 Nov;28(11):2201-7 - PubMed
    1. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1996 Feb;16(2):310-6 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 1995 Oct 1;92(7):1758-64 - PubMed
    1. Arterioscler Thromb. 1993 Oct;13(10):1404-11 - PubMed
    1. Radiographics. 2000 Nov-Dec;20(6):1787-806 - PubMed

Publication types