Bonding ability evaluation of bone cement on the cortical surface of rabbit's tibia
- PMID: 19728043
- DOI: 10.1007/s10856-009-3861-7
Bonding ability evaluation of bone cement on the cortical surface of rabbit's tibia
Abstract
A composite bone cement designated G2B1 that contains beta tricalcium phosphate particles was developed as a bone substitute for percutaneous transpedicular vertebroplasty. In this study, both G2B1 and commercial PMMA bone cement (CMW1) were implanted into proximal tibiae of rabbits, and their bone-bonding strengths were evaluated at 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks after implantation. Some of the specimens were evaluated histologically using Giemsa surface staining, contact microradiography (CMR) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Histological findings showed that G2B1 contacted bone directly without intervening soft tissue in the specimens at each time point, while there was always a soft tissue layer between CMW1 and bone. The bone-bonding strength of G2B1 was significantly higher than that of CMW1 at each time point, and significantly increased from 4 weeks to 8 and 12 weeks, while it decreased significantly from 12 weeks to 16 weeks. Bone remodeling of the cortex under the cement was observed especially for G2B1 and presumably influenced the bone bonding strength of the cement. The results indicate that G2B1 has bioactivity, and bone bonding strength of bioactive bone cements can be estimated fairly with this experimental model in the short term.
Similar articles
-
The biocompatibility and osteoconductivity of a cement containing beta-TCP for use in vertebroplasty.J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006 Sep 1;78(3):629-37. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.30793. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006. PMID: 16788976
-
PMMA-based bioactive cement: effect of CaF2 on osteoconductivity and histological change with time.J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2003 May 15;65(2):262-71. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.10008. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2003. PMID: 12687719
-
Biological and mechanical properties of PMMA-based bioactive bone cements.Biomaterials. 2000 Nov;21(21):2137-46. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00097-1. Biomaterials. 2000. PMID: 10985486
-
In vivo evaluation of bioactive PMMA-based bone cement with unchanged mechanical properties in a load-bearing model on rabbits.J Biomater Appl. 2015 Jul;30(1):30-7. doi: 10.1177/0885328215569092. Epub 2015 Jan 26. J Biomater Appl. 2015. PMID: 25627649
-
Interfacial tensile strength between polymethylmethacrylate-based bioactive bone cements and bone.J Biomed Mater Res. 2002 Sep 15;61(4):564-71. doi: 10.1002/jbm.10214. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002. PMID: 12115446
Cited by
-
Interface micromechanics of transverse sections from retrieved cemented hip reconstructions: an experimental and finite element comparison.J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2012 Aug;23(8):2023-35. doi: 10.1007/s10856-012-4626-2. Epub 2012 Jun 8. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2012. PMID: 22678039 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of cement creep and cement fatigue damage on the micromechanics of the cement-bone interface.J Biomech. 2010 Nov 16;43(15):3028-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.06.031. Epub 2010 Aug 7. J Biomech. 2010. PMID: 20692663 Free PMC article.
-
The mechanical effects of different levels of cement penetration at the cement-bone interface.J Biomech. 2010 Apr 19;43(6):1167-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.11.033. J Biomech. 2010. PMID: 20022010 Free PMC article.
-
Biomaterial-based strategies for bone cement: modulating the bone microenvironment and promoting regeneration.J Nanobiotechnology. 2025 May 13;23(1):343. doi: 10.1186/s12951-025-03363-5. J Nanobiotechnology. 2025. PMID: 40361125 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The biocompatibility of porous vs non-porous bone cements: a new methodological approach.Eur J Histochem. 2014 Jun 23;58(2):2255. doi: 10.4081/ejh.2014.2255. Eur J Histochem. 2014. PMID: 24998920 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources