Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009;24(9):553-72.
doi: 10.1007/s10654-009-9386-z.

The Rotterdam Study: 2010 objectives and design update

Affiliations

The Rotterdam Study: 2010 objectives and design update

Albert Hofman et al. Eur J Epidemiol. 2009.

Abstract

The Rotterdam Study is a prospective cohort study ongoing since 1990 in the city of Rotterdam in The Netherlands. The study targets cardiovascular, endocrine, hepatic, neurological, ophthalmic, psychiatric and respiratory diseases. As of 2008, 14,926 subjects aged 45 years or over comprise the Rotterdam Study cohort. The findings of the Rotterdam Study have been presented in close to a 1,000 research articles and reports (see www.epib.nl/rotterdamstudy). This article gives the rationale of the study and its design. It also presents a summary of the major findings and an update of the objectives and methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Diagram of examination cycles of the Rotterdam Study (RS). RS-I-1 refers to the baseline examination of the original cohort (pilot phase 07/1989-12/1989; cohort recruitment 01/1990-09/1993). RS-I-2, RS-I-3 and RS-I-4 refer to re-examination of the original cohort members. RS-II-1 refers to the extension of the cohort with persons in the study district that became 55 years since the start of the study or those of 55 years or over that migrated to the study district. RS-II-2 refers to the re-examination of the extension cohort. RS-III-1 refers to the baseline examination of all persons aged 45 years and over living in the study district that had not been examined (i.e., mainly comprising those aged 45–55 years)

References

    1. Oeppen J, Vaupel JW. Broken limits to life expectancy. Science. 2002;296:1029–31. - PubMed
    1. Peto R, Doll R. There is no such thing as aging. BMJ. 1997;315:1030–2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hofman A, Grobbee DE, de Jong PTVM, van den Ouweland FA. Determinants of disease and disability in the elderly: the Rotterdam Study. Eur J Epidemiol. 1991;7:403–22. - PubMed
    1. Hofman A, Breteler MMB, van Duijn CM, et al. The Rotterdam Study: objectives and design update. Eur J Epidemiol. 2007;22(11):819–29. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stang A. Appropriate epidemiologic methods as a prerequisite for valid study results. Eur J Epidemiol. 2008;23(12):761–5. - PubMed

Publication types