Usefulness of the valvuloarterial impedance to predict adverse outcome in asymptomatic aortic stenosis
- PMID: 19729117
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.04.079
Usefulness of the valvuloarterial impedance to predict adverse outcome in asymptomatic aortic stenosis
Abstract
Objectives: This study was designed to examine the prognostic value of valvuloarterial impedance (Z(va)) in patients with aortic stenosis (AS).
Background: We previously showed that the Z(va) is superior to standard indexes of AS severity in estimating the global hemodynamic load faced by the left ventricle (LV) and predicting the occurrence of LV dysfunction. This index is calculated by dividing the estimated LV systolic pressure (systolic arterial pressure + mean transvalvular gradient) by the stroke volume indexed for the body surface area.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and echocardiographic data of 544 consecutive patients having at least moderate AS (aortic jet velocity > or =2.5 m.s(-1)) and no symptoms at baseline. The primary end point for this study was the overall mortality regardless of the realization of aortic valve replacement (AVR).
Results: Four-year survival was significantly (p < 0.001) lower in the patients with a baseline Z(va) > or =4.5 mm Hg x ml(-1) x m(2) (65 +/- 5%) compared with those with Z(va) between 3.5 and 4.5 mm Hg x ml(-1) x m(2) (78 +/- 4%) and those with Z(va) < or =3.5 mm Hg x ml(-1) x m(2) (88 +/- 3%). The risk of mortality was increased by 2.76-fold in patients with Z(va) > or =4.5 mm Hg x ml(-1) x m(2) and by 2.30-fold in those with a Z(va) between 3.5 and 4.5 mm Hg x ml(-1) x m(2) after adjusting for other risk factors and type of treatment (surgical vs. medical).
Conclusions: Increased Z(va) is a marker of excessive LV hemodynamic load, and a value >3.5 successfully identifies patients with a poor outcome. These findings suggest that beyond standard indexes of stenosis severity, the consideration of Z(va) may be useful to improve risk stratification and clinical decision making in patients with AS.
Comment in
-
Aortic stenosis severity: do we need a new concept?J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Sep 8;54(11):1012-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.05.040. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009. PMID: 19729118 No abstract available.
-
Diastolic dysfunction in aortic stenosis and arterial stiffness.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Mar 16;55(11):1164; author reply 1165-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.10.045. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010. PMID: 20223376 No abstract available.
-
Usefulness of valvuloarterial impedance to predict adverse outcomes in patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Mar 16;55(11):1164-5; author reply 1165-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.10.044. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010. PMID: 20223377 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials