Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 Sep 1;34(19):2096-103.
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b1fab2.

Effect of epsilon aminocaproic acid on red-cell transfusion requirements in major spinal surgery

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of epsilon aminocaproic acid on red-cell transfusion requirements in major spinal surgery

Sean M Berenholtz et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). .

Abstract

Study design: : Randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Objective: : To evaluate the efficacy of epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) to reduce the number of red-cell (RBC) transfusions in adult patients undergoing major spinal surgery.

Summary of background data: : Reconstructive spinal surgery is associated with significant blood loss. The number of studies evaluating the efficacy of EACA in adult patients undergoing spinal surgery remains scarce and limited.

Methods: : EACA (100 mg/kg) or placebo was administered to 182 adult patients after the induction of anesthesia followed by an infusion that was continued for 8 hours after surgery. Primary end points included total allogeneic RBC transfusions through postoperative day 8 and postoperative allogeneic plus autologus RBC transfusions through postoperative day 8.

Results: : Mean total allogeneic RBC transfusions were not statistically different between the groups (5.9 units EACA vs. 6.9 units placebo; P = 0.17). Mean postoperative RBC transfusions in the EACA group was less (2.0 units vs. 2.8 units placebo; P = 0.03). There was no significantdifference in mean estimated intraoperative estimated-blood loss (2938 cc EACA vs. 3273 cc placebo; P = 0.32). Mean intensive care unit length of stay was decreased (EACA: 1.8 days vs. 2.8 days placebo; P = 0.04). The incidence of thromboembolic complications was similar (2.2% EACA vs. 6.6% placebo; P = 0.15).

Conclusion: : The difference in total allogeneic RBC transfusions between the groups was not statistically significant. EACA was associated with a 30% (0.8 units) reduction in postoperative RBC transfusions and a 1-day reduction in ICU LOS, without an increased incidence of thromboembolic events. EACA may be considered for patients undergoing major spinal surgery. Larger studies are needed to evaluate the relationship between EACA and total RBC requirements.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00320619.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Screening and Enrollment of Study Patients.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Total allogeneic RBC transfusions
The box-plot represents the distribution of allogeneic RBC units transfused per patient during intraoperative period through postoperative day 8. The box represents the 25th to 75th percentile and the center line in the box represents the 50th percentile of units transfused. The bars above and below the box represent the range of units transfused. Mean and median total allogeneic RBC transfusions was only slightly decreased in the EACA group compared to the placebo group relative to the decrease in the upper range of the number of units transfused
Figure 3
Figure 3. Postoperative RBC transfusions
The box-plot represents the distribution of allogeneic and autologous RBC units transfused per patient during the postoperative period (post-surgery through postoperative day 8). The box represents the 25th to 75th percentile and the center line in the box represents the 50th percentile of units transfused. The bars above and below the box represent the range of units transfused. Mean and median postoperative RBC transfusions was only slightly decreased in the EACA group compared to the placebo group relative to the decrease in the upper range of the number of units transfused.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Goodnough LT, Brecher ME, Kanter MH, AuBuchon JP. Transfusion Medicine. First of two parts: Blood transfusion. NEJM. 1999;340(6):438–447. - PubMed
    1. Blajchman MA, Vamvakas EC. The continuing risk of transfusion-transmitted infections. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1303–1305. - PubMed
    1. Spahn DR, Casutt M. Eliminating blood transfusions: New aspects and perspectives. Anesthesiology. 2000;93(1):242–255. - PubMed
    1. Mannucci PM, Levi M. Prevention and Treatment of Major Blood Loss. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:2301–2311. - PubMed
    1. Henry DA, Carless PA, Moxey AJ, O’Connell D, Stokes BJ, McClelland B, Laupacis A, Fergusson D. Anti-fibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;17(4) CD001886. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data