Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Oct 30;28(24):2941-51.
doi: 10.1002/sim.3684.

An adaptive design for identifying the dose with the best efficacy/tolerability profile with application to a crossover dose-finding study

Affiliations

An adaptive design for identifying the dose with the best efficacy/tolerability profile with application to a crossover dose-finding study

Anastasia Ivanova et al. Stat Med. .

Erratum in

  • Stat Med. 2010 Dec 20;29(29):3068

Abstract

Proof-of-concept in clinical trials has traditionally focused on the identification of a maximum tolerated dose with the assumption that the higher doses provide better efficacy. However, adverse events associated with a maximum tolerated dose may have a negative effect on efficacy. We present an efficient adaptive dose-finding strategy that concentrates patient assignments at and around the dose which has the best efficacy/tolerability profile based on a utility function. The strategy is applied within the setting of a crossover design. While the strategy may also be applied to parallel studies, a crossover design provides more power for a given sample size for comparisons between the optimal dose versus placebo and/or active control when it is reasonable to assume no carryover effects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Six efficacy-tolerability scenarios showing the values for utility (Utl), efficacy (Eff) and tolerability (AE). Utility is computed as Efficacy − 10×Tolerability.

References

    1. O’Quigley J, Huges MD, Fenton T. Dose-finding designs for HIV studies. Biometrics. 2001;57:1018–1029. - PubMed
    1. Thall PF, Inoue LY, Martin TG. Adaptive decision-making in a lymphocyte infusion trial. Biometrics. 2002;58:560–568. - PubMed
    1. Ivanova A. A new dose-finding design for bivariate outcomes. Biometrics. 2003;59:1003–1009. - PubMed
    1. Dragalin V, Fedorov V. Adaptive designs for dose-finding based on efficacy—toxicity response. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference. 2006;136:1800–1823.
    1. Thall PF, Cook JD. Dose-finding based on efficacy-toxicity trade-offs. Biometrics. 2004;60:684–693. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources