Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2010 Feb 23;6(1):74-7.
doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0612. Epub 2009 Sep 9.

Extrapolating non-target risk of Bt crops from laboratory to field

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Extrapolating non-target risk of Bt crops from laboratory to field

Jian J Duan et al. Biol Lett. .

Abstract

The tiered approach to assessing ecological risk of insect-resistant transgenic crops assumes that lower tier laboratory studies, which expose surrogate non-target organisms to high doses of insecticidal proteins, can detect harmful effects that might be manifested in the field. To test this assumption, we performed meta-analyses comparing results for non-target invertebrates exposed to Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) Cry proteins in laboratory studies with results derived from independent field studies examining effects on the abundance of non-target invertebrates. For Lepidopteran-active Cry proteins, laboratory studies correctly predicted the reduced field abundance of non-target Lepidoptera. However, laboratory studies incorporating tri-trophic interactions of Bt plants, herbivores and parasitoids were better correlated with the decreased field abundance of parasitoids than were direct-exposure assays. For predators, laboratory tri-trophic studies predicted reduced abundances that were not realized in field studies and thus overestimated ecological risk. Exposure to Coleopteran-active Cry proteins did not significantly reduce the laboratory survival or field abundance of any functional group examined. Our findings support the assumption that laboratory studies of transgenic insecticidal crops show effects that are either consistent with, or more conservative than, those found in field studies, with the important caveat that laboratory studies should explore all ecologically relevant routes of exposure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Effect sizes measured in the field versus laboratory for major functional groups of non-target invertebrates. Laboratory studies for parasitoids and predators used either direct or tri-trophic exposure. Positive mean effect sizes (Hedge's d) for (a) Lepidopteran-active and (b) Coleopteran-active Bt Cry proteins indicate improved survival or increased abundance when exposed to Bt plant tissues or purified Cry proteins relative to a non-Bt control. Error bars represent unbiased, bootstrapped 95 per cent confidence intervals. Numbers denote total observations per column. Medium grey bars, field; dark grey bars, laboratory (direct exposure); light grey bars, laboratory (tri-trophic).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Effect sizes measured in laboratory (direct and tri-trophic studies pooled) versus field studies for species with five or more observations per study type. Data are pooled across Lepidopteran-active and Coleopteran-active Cry protein studies. P, predator; H, herbivore. See figure 1 for description of chart elements. Lighter grey bars, field; darker grey bars, laboratory (tri-trophic and direct exposure).

References

    1. Andow D. A., Hilbeck A.2004Science-based risk assessment for nontarget effects of transgenic crops. Bioscience 54, 637–649 (doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0637:SRAFNE]2.0.CO;2) - DOI
    1. Cloutier C., Boudreault S., Michaud D.2008Impact of Colorado potato beetle-resistant potatoes on non-target arthropods: a meta-analysis of factors potentially involved in the failure of a Bt transgenic plant. Cah. Agric. 17, 388–394
    1. Lundgren J. G., Gassmann A. J., Bernal J. S., Duan J. J., Ruberson J. R.In press Ecological compatibility of GM crops and biological control. Crop Prot. (doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2009.06.001) - DOI
    1. Marvier M., McCreedy C., Regetz J., Kareiva P.2007A meta-analysis of effects of Bt cotton and maize on non-target invertebrates. Science 316, 1475–1477 (doi:10.1126/science.1139208) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Naranjo S. E.2009Impacts of Bt crops on non-target organisms and insecticide use patterns. Perspect. Agr. Vet. Sci. Nutr. Nat. Resour. 4, 1–23 (doi:10.1079/PAVSNNR20094011) - DOI

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources