Effect of filler particle size and morphology on force/work parameters for stickiness of unset resin-composites
- PMID: 19744705
- DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.08.002
Effect of filler particle size and morphology on force/work parameters for stickiness of unset resin-composites
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the effect of variation in filler particle size and morphology within an unset model series of resin-composites on two stickiness parameters: (1) maximum probe separation-force and (2) work-of-separation. This study was to complement previously reported measurements of composite stickiness in terms of a strain-parameter, 'peak-height'.
Materials and methods: Eleven experimental light cured resin-composites were selected. All had the same matrix (Bis-GMA, UDMA and TEGDMA, with 0.33% camphoroquinone) and the same filler volume fraction-56.7%, however filler particles varied in size and shape and were either unimodal or multimodal in size-distribution. Each material was placed in a cylindrical mould (phi=7mmx5mm depth) held at 26 or 37 degrees C. The maximum force (F(max), N) and work of probe-separation (W(s), Nmm) were measured. A flat-ended stainless-steel probe (phi=6mm) was mechanically lowered onto and into the surface of the unset sample, until a compressive force of 1N was reached, which was held constant for 1s. Then the probe was moved vertically upward at a constant speed; either 2 or 8mm/s. The tensile force produced on the probe by the sticky composite was plotted against displacement and the maximum value was identified (F(max)). W(s) was obtained as the integrated area. Data was analyzed by multivariate ANOVA and multiple pair-wise comparisons using a Tukey post hoc test to establish homogenous subsets (at p=0.05) for F(max) and a Games-Howell was used for W(s).
Results: As potential measures of stickiness, F(max) and W(s) showed more coherent trends with fillersize when measured at the lower of the two probe speeds, 2mm/s. For unimodal resin-composite F(max) ranged from 1.04 to 5.11N and W(s) from 0.48 to 11.12Nmm. For the multimodal resin-composite they ranged from 1.64 to 4.13N and from 2.32 to 8.34Nmm respectively. Temperature increase tended to slightly reduce F(max), although this trend was not consistent. W(s) generally increased with temperature.
Conclusion: Filler particle size and morphology influences F(max) and W(s) of uncured resin-composite which partly express the handling behaviors of resin-composites.
Similar articles
-
A method for assessing force/work parameters for stickiness of unset resin-composites.Dent Mater. 2011 Aug;27(8):805-10. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.04.005. Epub 2011 May 20. Dent Mater. 2011. PMID: 21600644
-
Effect of resin-composite filler particle size and shape on shrinkage-strain.Dent Mater. 2009 Dec;25(12):1612-5. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.08.012. Epub 2009 Oct 3. Dent Mater. 2009. PMID: 19801168
-
The effect of a leucite-containing ceramic filler on the abrasive wear of dental composites.Dent Mater. 2007 Sep;23(9):1181-7. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.03.006. Epub 2007 May 15. Dent Mater. 2007. PMID: 17507087
-
How much do resin-based dental materials release? A meta-analytical approach.Dent Mater. 2011 Aug;27(8):723-47. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.05.001. Epub 2011 Jun 12. Dent Mater. 2011. PMID: 21664675 Review.
-
Elution of leachable components from composites.J Oral Rehabil. 1994 Jul;21(4):441-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1994.tb01158.x. J Oral Rehabil. 1994. PMID: 7965355 Review.
Cited by
-
Viscosity modulation of resin composites versus hand application on internal adaptation of restorations.Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jul;26(7):4847-4856. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04452-7. Epub 2022 Mar 21. Clin Oral Investig. 2022. PMID: 35314890
-
Dimethacrylate network formation and polymer property evolution as determined by the selection of monomers and curing conditions.Dent Mater. 2012 Jan;28(1):13-22. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.005. Dent Mater. 2012. PMID: 22192248 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Recent advances and developments in composite dental restorative materials.J Dent Res. 2011 Apr;90(4):402-16. doi: 10.1177/0022034510381263. Epub 2010 Oct 5. J Dent Res. 2011. PMID: 20924063 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A 23-Year Observational Follow-Up Clinical Evaluation of Direct Posterior Composite Restorations.Dent J (Basel). 2023 Mar 1;11(3):69. doi: 10.3390/dj11030069. Dent J (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36975566 Free PMC article.
-
Surface Roughness and Color Stability of Conventional and Bulk-Fill Resin Composite with S-PRG Fillers After Coffee Exposure: An in-vitro Study.Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2025 Jan 8;17:21-29. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S496750. eCollection 2025. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2025. PMID: 39802460 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous