Trial of 2009 influenza A (H1N1) monovalent MF59-adjuvanted vaccine
- PMID: 19745215
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907650
Trial of 2009 influenza A (H1N1) monovalent MF59-adjuvanted vaccine
Abstract
Background: The 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus has emerged to cause the first pandemic of the 21st century. Development of effective vaccines is a public health priority.
Methods: We conducted a single-center study, involving 176 adults, 18 to 50 years of age, to test the monovalent influenza A/California/2009 (H1N1) surface-antigen vaccine, in both MF59-adjuvanted and nonadjuvanted forms. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive two intramuscular injections of vaccine containing 7.5 microg of hemagglutinin on day 0 in each arm or one injection on day 0 and the other on day 7, 14, or 21; or two 3.75-microg doses of MF59-adjuvanted vaccine, or 7.5 or 15 microg of nonadjuvanted vaccine, administered 21 days apart. Antibody responses were measured by means of hemagglutination-inhibition assay and a microneutralization assay on days 0, 14, 21, and 42 after injection of the first dose.
Results: The most frequent local and systemic reactions were pain at the injection site and muscle aches, noted in 70% and 42% of subjects, respectively; reactions were more common with the MF59-adjuvanted vaccine than with nonadjuvanted vaccine. Three subjects reported fever, with a temperature of 38 degrees C or higher, after either dose. Antibody titers, expressed as geometric means, were higher at day 21 among subjects who had received one dose of MF59-adjuvanted vaccine than among those who had received one dose of nonadjuvanted vaccine (P<0.001 by the microneutralization assay). By day 21, hemagglutination-inhibition and microneutralization antibody titers of 1:40 or more were seen in 77 to 96% and 92 to 100% of subjects receiving MF59-adjuvanted vaccine, respectively, and in 63 to 72% and 67 to 76% of those receiving nonadjuvanted vaccine, respectively. By day 42, after two doses of vaccine, hemagglutination-inhibition and microneutralization antibody titers of 1:40 or more were seen in 92 to 100% and 100% of recipients of MF59-adjuvanted vaccine, respectively, and in 74 to 79% and 78 to 83% of recipients of nonadjuvanted vaccine, respectively.
Conclusions: Monovalent 2009 influenza A (H1N1) MF59-adjuvanted vaccine generates antibody responses likely to be associated with protection after a single dose is administered. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00943358).
Copyright 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society
Comment in
-
Pandemic influenza vaccine policy--considering the early evidence.N Engl J Med. 2009 Dec 17;361(25):e59. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe0908224. Epub 2009 Sep 10. N Engl J Med. 2009. PMID: 19745213 No abstract available.
-
ACP Journal Club. One or two 7.5-microg doses of MF59-adjuvanted influenza A (H1N1) 2009 vaccine was immunogenic in adults within 21 days.Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jan 19;152(2):JC1-8, JC1-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-2-201001190-02008. Ann Intern Med. 2010. PMID: 20083823 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Safety and immunogenicity of an MF59-adjuvanted A/H1N1 pandemic influenza vaccine in children from three to seventeen years of age.Vaccine. 2015 Jan 1;33(1):174-81. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.10.085. Epub 2014 Nov 11. Vaccine. 2015. PMID: 25444803 Clinical Trial.
-
Immunogenicity and tolerability of an MF59-adjuvanted, egg-derived, A/H1N1 pandemic influenza vaccine in children 6-35 months of age.Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2014 Dec;33(12):e320-9. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000000462. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2014. PMID: 24978857 Clinical Trial.
-
Immunogenicity and safety of the influenza A/H1N1 2009 inactivated split-virus vaccine in young and older adults: MF59-adjuvanted vaccine versus nonadjuvanted vaccine.Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2011 Aug;18(8):1358-64. doi: 10.1128/CVI.05111-11. Epub 2011 Jun 29. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2011. PMID: 21715575 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Priming with MF59 adjuvanted versus nonadjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccines in children - A systematic review and a meta-analysis.Vaccine. 2020 Jan 16;38(3):608-619. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.10.053. Epub 2019 Nov 15. Vaccine. 2020. PMID: 31735505
-
An indirect comparison meta-analysis of AS03 and MF59 adjuvants in pandemic influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccines.Vaccine. 2019 Jul 18;37(31):4246-4255. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.06.039. Epub 2019 Jun 26. Vaccine. 2019. PMID: 31253447 Review.
Cited by
-
Estimation of the health impact and cost-effectiveness of influenza vaccination with enhanced effectiveness in Canada.PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27420. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027420. Epub 2011 Nov 14. PLoS One. 2011. PMID: 22110645 Free PMC article.
-
The importance of contact network topology for the success of vaccination strategies.J Theor Biol. 2013 May 21;325:12-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.01.006. Epub 2013 Jan 29. J Theor Biol. 2013. PMID: 23376579 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of the trivalent influenza vaccine in Navarre, Spain, 2010-2011: a population-based test-negative case-control study.BMC Public Health. 2013 Mar 6;13:191. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-191. BMC Public Health. 2013. PMID: 23496887 Free PMC article.
-
T cell epitope engineering: an avian H7N9 influenza vaccine strategy for pandemic preparedness and response.Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018;14(9):2203-2207. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1495303. Epub 2018 Sep 5. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018. PMID: 30015562 Free PMC article. Review.
-
New vaccines against influenza virus.Clin Exp Vaccine Res. 2014 Jan;3(1):12-28. doi: 10.7774/cevr.2014.3.1.12. Epub 2013 Dec 18. Clin Exp Vaccine Res. 2014. PMID: 24427759 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical