The GRADE system for rating clinical guidelines
- PMID: 19753107
- PMCID: PMC2735782
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000094
The GRADE system for rating clinical guidelines
Abstract
Brian Kavanagh critiques the GRADE system of grading guidelines, arguing that even though it has evolved through the Evidence-Based Medicine movement, there is no evidence that GRADE itself is reliable.
Conflict of interest statement
The author has declared that no competing interests exist.
Comment in
-
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations: a perspective.PLoS Med. 2009 Sep;6(9):e1000151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000151. Epub 2009 Sep 15. PLoS Med. 2009. PMID: 19753108 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Laupacis A, Sackett DL, Goldberg RJ. Clinical recommendations using levels of evidence for antithrombotic agents. Chest. 1995;108:227S–230S. - PubMed
-
- Sackett DL. Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents. Chest. 1989;95:2S–4S. - PubMed
-
- Ferraris VA, Ferraris SP, Saha SP, Hessel EA, 2nd, Haan CK, et al. Perioperative blood transfusion and blood conservation in cardiac surgery: the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and The Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists clinical practice guideline. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:S27–86. - PubMed
-
- Fergusson DA, Hebert PC, Mazer CD, Fremes S, MacAdams C, et al. A comparison of aprotinin and lysine analogues in high-risk cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2319–2331. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources