Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009;27(9):713-23.
doi: 10.2165/11317060-000000000-00000.

Methods for measuring temporary health States for cost-utility analyses

Affiliations
Review

Methods for measuring temporary health States for cost-utility analyses

Davene R Wright et al. Pharmacoeconomics. 2009.

Abstract

A variety of methods are available to measure preferences for temporary health states for cost-utility analyses. The objectives of this review were to summarize the available temporary health-state valuation methods, identify advantages and disadvantages of each, and identify areas for future research. We describe the key aspects of each method and summarize advantages and disadvantages of each method in terms of consistency with QALY theory, relevance to temporary health-state-specific domains, ease of use, time preference, and performance in validation studies. Two broad categories of methods were identified: traditional and adapted. Traditional methods were health status instruments, time trade-off (TTO), and the standard gamble (SG). Methods adapted specifically for temporary health-state valuation were TTO with specified duration of the health state, TTO with a lifespan modification, waiting trade-off, chained approaches for TTO and SG, and sleep trade-off. Advantages and disadvantages vary by method and no 'gold standard' method emerged. Selection of a method to value temporary health states will depend on the relative importance of the following considerations: ability to accurately capture the unique characteristics of the temporary health state, level of respondent burden and cognition, theoretical consistency of elicited preference values with the overall purpose of the study, and resources available for study development and data collection. Further research should focus on evaluating validity, reliability and feasibility of temporary health-state valuation methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Med Decis Making. 1995 Apr-Jun;15(2):180-6 - PubMed
    1. Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(35):iii-iv, xi-xiii, 1-170 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Health Econ. 2004 Feb;5(1):81-6 - PubMed
    1. Acad Radiol. 2003 Mar;10(3):266-74 - PubMed
    1. J Health Econ. 2004 Jan;23(1):157-71 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources