Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Sep 17:9:167.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-167.

Dutch healthcare reform: did it result in performance improvement of health plans? A comparison of consumer experiences over time

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Dutch healthcare reform: did it result in performance improvement of health plans? A comparison of consumer experiences over time

Michelle Hendriks et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Many countries have introduced elements of managed competition in their healthcare system with the aim to accomplish more efficient and demand-driven health care. Simultaneously, generating and reporting of comparative healthcare information has become an important quality-improvement instrument. We examined whether the introduction of managed competition in the Dutch healthcare system along with public reporting of quality information was associated with performance improvement in health plans.

Methods: Experiences of consumers with their health plan were measured in four consecutive years (2005-2008) using the CQI(R) health plan instrument 'Experiences with Healthcare and Health Insurer'. Data were available of 13,819 respondents (response = 45%) of 30 health plans in 2005, of 8,266 respondents (response = 39%) of 32 health plans in 2006, of 8,088 respondents (response = 34%) of 32 health plans in 2007, and of 7,183 respondents (response = 31%) of 32 health plans in 2008. We performed multilevel regression analyses with three levels: respondent, health plan and year of measurement. Per year and per quality aspect, we estimated health plan means while adjusting for consumers' age, education and self-reported health status. We tested for linear and quadratic time effects using chi-squares.

Results: The overall performance of health plans increased significantly from 2005 to 2008 on four quality aspects. For three other aspects, we found that the overall performance first declined and then increased from 2006 to 2008, but the performance in 2008 was not better than in 2005. The overall performance of health plans did not improve more often for quality aspects that were identified as important areas of improvement in the first year of measurement. On six out of seven aspects, the performance of health plans that scored below average in 2005 increased more than the performance of health plans that scored average and/or above average in that year.

Conclusion: We found mixed results concerning the effects of managed competition on the performance of health plans. To determine whether managed competition in the healthcare system leads to quality improvement in health plans, it is important to examine whether and for what reasons health plans initiate improvement efforts.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Light DW. Comparative institutional response to economic policy: managed competition and governmentality. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52:1151–1166. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00236-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Saltman RB, Figueras J. Analyzing the evidence on European health care reforms. Health Aff. 1998;17:85–108. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.17.2.85. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fung CH, Lim Y, Mattke S, Damberg C, Shekelle PG. Systematic review: The evidence that publishing patient care performance data improves quality of care. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:111–123. - PubMed
    1. Mannion R, Goddard M. Public disclosure of comparative clinical performance data: lessons from the Scottish experience. J Eval Clin Pract. 2003;9:277–286. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2003.00388.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marshall M, Brook R. Public reporting of comparative information about quality of healthcare. Med J Aust. 2002;176:205–206. - PubMed

Publication types