Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 Sep 17:9:44.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-9-44.

Pessaries in multiple pregnancy as a prevention of preterm birth: the ProTwin Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Pessaries in multiple pregnancy as a prevention of preterm birth: the ProTwin Trial

Maud A Hegeman et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Erratum in

  • BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12:37

Abstract

Background: Multiple pregnancies are at high risk for preterm birth, and therefore an important cause of infant mortality and morbidity. A pessary is a simple and potentially effective measure for the prevention of preterm birth. Small studies have indicated its effectiveness, but large studies with sufficient power on the subject are lacking. Despite this lack of evidence, the treatment is at present applied by some gynaecologists in The Netherlands.

Methods/design: We aim to investigate the hypothesis that prophylactic use of a cervical pessary will be effective in the prevention of preterm delivery and the neonatal mortality and morbidity resulting from preterm delivery in multiple pregnancy. We will evaluate the costs and effects of this intervention. At study entry, cervical length will be measured. Eligible women will be randomly allocated to receive either a cervical pessary or no intervention. The cervical pessary will be placed in situ at 16 to 20 weeks, and will stay in situ up to 36 weeks gestation or until delivery, whatever comes first.The primary outcome is composite bad neonatal condition (perinatal death or severe morbidity). Secondary outcome measures are time to delivery, preterm birth rate before 32 and 37 weeks, days of admission in neonatal intensive care unit, maternal morbidity, maternal admission days for preterm labour and costs. We need to include 660 women to indicate a reduction in bad neonatal outcome from 7.2% without to 3.9% with a cervical pessary, using a two-sided test with an alpha of 0.05 and a power of 0.80.

Discussion: This trial will provide evidence on whether a cervical pessary will decrease the incidence of early preterm birth and its concomitant bad neonatal outcome in multiple pregnancies.

Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials: NTR 1858.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bruinse HWVG. Meerlingen (Multiple Pregnancy) Uitgeverij Elsevier/de Tijdstroom. 1997.
    1. Landelijke Verloskundige Registratie 2002 Dutch obstetrical Database 2002. Prismant 2002. 2009 doi: 10.1001/jama.286.13.1581. - DOI
    1. Landelijke Neonatale Registratie 2003 Dutch Neonatal Database 2002. Prismant 2002. 2009 doi: 10.1097/00006254-200007000-00023. - DOI
    1. Guinn DA, Atkinson MW, Sullivan L, Lee M, MacGregor S, Parilla BV, et al. Single vs weekly courses of antenatal corticosteroids for women at risk of preterm delivery: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2001;286:1581–7. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.13.1581. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Newcomer J. Pessaries for the treatment of incompetent cervix and premature delivery. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2000;55:443–8. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2003.017. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types