The effect of computer-assisted learning versus conventional teaching methods on the acquisition and retention of handwashing theory and skills in pre-qualification nursing students: a randomised controlled trial
- PMID: 19762016
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.08.003
The effect of computer-assisted learning versus conventional teaching methods on the acquisition and retention of handwashing theory and skills in pre-qualification nursing students: a randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Background: High quality health care demands a nursing workforce with sound clinical skills. However, the clinical competency of newly qualified nurses continues to stimulate debate about the adequacy of current methods of clinical skills education and emphasises the need for innovative teaching strategies. Despite the increasing use of e-learning within nurse education, evidence to support its use for clinical skills teaching is limited and inconclusive.
Objectives: This study tested whether nursing students could learn and retain the theory and skill of handwashing more effectively when taught using computer-assisted learning compared with conventional face-to-face methods.
Design: The study employed a two group randomised controlled design. The intervention group used an interactive, multimedia, self-directed computer-assisted learning module. The control group was taught by an experienced lecturer in a clinical skills room. Data were collected over a 5-month period between October 2004 and February 2005. Knowledge was tested at four time points and handwashing skills were assessed twice.
Setting and participants: Two-hundred and forty-two first year nursing students of mixed gender; age; educational background and first language studying at one British university were recruited to the study. Participant attrition increased during the study.
Results: Knowledge scores increased significantly from baseline in both groups and no significant differences were detected between the scores of the two groups. Skill performance scores were similar in both groups at the 2-week follow-up with significant differences emerging at the 8-week follow-up in favour of the intervention group, however, this finding must be interpreted with caution in light of sample size and attrition rates.
Conclusion: The computer-assisted learning module was an effective strategy for teaching both the theory and practice of handwashing to nursing students and in this study was found to be at least as effective as conventional face-to-face teaching methods.
Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Computer-assisted module for nursing students provides similar improvements in handwashing knowledge and may improve handwashing practice compared with face-to-face teaching.Evid Based Nurs. 2010 Oct;13(4):118-9. doi: 10.1136/ebn1093. Evid Based Nurs. 2010. PMID: 20855339 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Computer-aided vs. tutor-delivered teaching of exposure therapy for phobia/panic: randomized controlled trial with pre-registration nursing students.Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Mar;44(3):397-405. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.02.009. Epub 2006 Apr 24. Int J Nurs Stud. 2007. PMID: 16631177 Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of competitive computer-assisted learning versus conventional teaching methods on the acquisition and retention of knowledge in medical surgical nursing students.Nurse Educ Today. 2011 Nov;31(8):866-71. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2010.12.026. Epub 2011 Jan 20. Nurse Educ Today. 2011. PMID: 21255880
-
The most successful method in teaching nursing students infection control - E-learning or lecture?Nurse Educ Today. 2008 Oct;28(7):798-806. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2008.03.005. Epub 2008 Apr 28. Nurse Educ Today. 2008. PMID: 18442872
-
Situated cognition and cognitive apprenticeship: a model for teaching and learning clinical skills in a technologically rich and authentic learning environment.Nurse Educ Today. 2007 Jan;27(1):73-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2006.02.010. Epub 2006 Apr 18. Nurse Educ Today. 2007. PMID: 16624452 Review.
-
Online teaching strategies to improve collaboration among nursing students.Nurse Educ Today. 2006 Dec;26(8):680-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2006.07.015. Epub 2006 Oct 18. Nurse Educ Today. 2006. PMID: 17052806 Review.
Cited by
-
Nursing Students Perceptions of Using YouTube to Teach Psychomotor Skills: A Comparative Pilot Study.SAGE Open Nurs. 2022 Jul 29;8:23779608221117385. doi: 10.1177/23779608221117385. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec. SAGE Open Nurs. 2022. PMID: 35923914 Free PMC article.
-
An investigation of the effectiveness of two different methods in teaching surgical aseptic skills: a quasi-experimental study.BMC Surg. 2025 Apr 11;25(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02870-4. BMC Surg. 2025. PMID: 40217483 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing nurses' knowledge retention following electronic continuous education and educational booklet: a controlled trial study.Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2016 May 7;30:364. eCollection 2016. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2016. PMID: 27493908 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions to improve knowledge or compliance to hand hygiene in nursing students: A scoping review.J Infect Prev. 2023 Jan;24(1):30-44. doi: 10.1177/17571774221127696. Epub 2022 Sep 15. J Infect Prev. 2023. PMID: 36644521 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of video-based versus personalized instruction on errors during elastic tubing exercises for musculoskeletal pain: a randomized controlled trial.Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:790937. doi: 10.1155/2014/790937. Epub 2014 Mar 10. Biomed Res Int. 2014. PMID: 24734244 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources