A comparative clinical study of the visual results between three types of multifocal lenses
- PMID: 19763600
- DOI: 10.1007/s00417-009-1177-4
A comparative clinical study of the visual results between three types of multifocal lenses
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the patients' visual results after bilateral implantation of the multifocal intraocular lenses (MIOLs): ReZoom (NXG1, Abbott Medical Optics, Abbott Park, IL, USA), Acrysof ReSTOR (SA60D3, Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX, USA) and Tecnis MF (ZM900, Abbott Medical Optics).
Materials and methods: A prospective, nonrandomized, comparative trial of 30 patients (60 eyes) aged 46-71 (mean age 56.3 +/- 5.96) divided into three equal groups with implanted bilaterally multifocal lenses: ReZoom IOL, Acrysof ReSTOR IOL and Tecnis MF IOL. The patient selection criteria included no other eye disease besides cataract, and corneal astigmatism of 1.5 diopters or less. In each case, the patients were scheduled to have standard phacoemulsification surgery with IOL implantation into the bag. The postoperative target was emmetropia. The mean follow-up was 6 months in all eyes. The following parameters were assessed/carried out: slit-lamp examination, uncorrected and best spectacle-corrected far and near visual acuity, autorefractometry, intraocular pressure, contrast sensitivity and subjective satisfaction with vision using the VF-14 survey.
Results: After surgery, all eyes were within +/-2.0D of target refraction. The mean uncorrected distance visual acuity improved in all cases. The postoperative BCDVA was better than 20/30 at the sixth month in all eyes. Six months postoperatively, the mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA) +/- standard error (SE) in the ReZoom, ReSTOR and Tecnis MF groups was 0.11 +/- 0.01, 0.17 +/- 0.02 and 0.14 +/- 0.02 (LogMAR) respectively. All results were significantly better compared to preoperative values (p < 0.001) but did not differ between the study groups (p > 0.05). At the final visit, 75% of eyes in the ReZoom group achieved J1 (Jaeger standard) in comparison to 85% in the ReSTOR and Tecnis MF groups. Eighty percent of patients with bilaterally implanted ReSTOR and Tecnis MF IOL were spectacle-independent, in comparison to 70% with implanted ReZoom IOL. Thirty percent of patients with implanted Rezoom and Acrysof Restor IOL and 20% with implanted Tecnis multifocal IOL reported little or moderate halo and glare. The patients' satisfaction after the procedure was excellent; the scoring on the VF-14 survey ranged from 70-100%, with an average of 93%. No patient was dissatisfied with the results of the surgery.
Conclusions: The implantation of tested multifocal intraocular lenses provides good near and distance visual acuity. We did not observe any statistically significant differences between the tested multifocal intraocular lenses with regard to best-corrected distance visual acuity, presence of glare and halo, as well as satisfaction with vision.
Similar articles
-
Visual performance of patients with bilateral vs combination Crystalens, ReZoom, and ReSTOR intraocular lens implants.Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Sep;144(3):347-357. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.05.036. Epub 2007 Jul 25. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007. PMID: 17651679 Clinical Trial.
-
Visual acuity outcomes with SA60D3, SN60D3, and ZM900 multifocal IOL implantation after phacoemulsification.J Refract Surg. 2010 Mar;26(3):177-82. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20100224-03. Epub 2010 Mar 11. J Refract Surg. 2010. PMID: 20229949
-
Bilateral mix-and-match versus unilateral multifocal intraocular lens implantation: long-term comparison.J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Nov;39(11):1682-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.04.043. Epub 2013 Aug 30. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013. PMID: 23993421
-
AcrySof IQ PanOptix Intraocular Lens Versus Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens and Trifocal Intraocular Lens: A Clinical Overview.Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2019 Jul-Aug;8(4):335-349. doi: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000253. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2019. PMID: 31403494 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of trifocal or hybrid multifocal-extended depth of focus intraocular lenses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 23;11(1):6699. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86222-1. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 33758333 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Premium intraocular lenses use in patients with cataract and concurrent glaucoma: a review.Maedica (Bucur). 2013 Sep;8(3):290-6. Maedica (Bucur). 2013. PMID: 24371502 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Clinical outcomes after cataract surgery with implantation of the Tecnis ZMB00 multifocal intraocular lens.Med Sci Monit. 2014 Jul 15;20:1220-6. doi: 10.12659/MSM.890585. Med Sci Monit. 2014. PMID: 25022700 Free PMC article.
-
Patient-reported outcome measures in presbyopia: a literature review.BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2020 Jul 12;5(1):e000453. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000453. eCollection 2020. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2020. PMID: 32685693 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical and Visual Outcomes of Four Presbyopia Correcting Intraocular Lenses.J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2024 Jun 21;19(2):152-160. doi: 10.18502/jovr.v19i2.11034. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2024. PMID: 39055501 Free PMC article.
-
Initial results of trifocal diffractive IOL implantation.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010 Sep;248(9):1299-306. doi: 10.1007/s00417-010-1424-8. Epub 2010 Jun 5. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010. PMID: 20526609
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources