How improving practice relationships among clinicians and nonclinicians can improve quality in primary care
- PMID: 19769206
- PMCID: PMC2928073
- DOI: 10.1016/s1553-7250(09)35064-3
How improving practice relationships among clinicians and nonclinicians can improve quality in primary care
Abstract
Background: Understanding the role of relationships health care organizations (HCOs) offers opportunities for shaping health care delivery. When quality is treated as a property arising from the relationships within HCOs, then different contributors of quality can be investigated and more effective strategies for improvement can be developed.
Methods: Data were drawn from four large National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded studies, and an iterative analytic strategy and a grounded theory approach were used to understand the characteristics of relationships within primary care practices. This multimethod approach amassed rich and comparable data sets in all four studies, which were all aimed at primary care practice improvement. The broad range of data included direct observation of practices during work activities and of patient-clinician interactions, in-depth interviews with physicians and other key staff members, surveys, structured checklists of office environments, and chart reviews. Analyses focused on characteristics of relationships in practices that exhibited a range of success in achieving practice improvement. Complex adaptive systems theory informed these analyses.
Findings: Trust, mindfulness, heedfulness, respectful interaction, diversity, social/task relatedness, and rich/lean communication were identified as important in practice improvement. A model of practice relationships was developed to describe how these characteristics work together and interact with reflection, sensemaking, and learning to influence practice-level quality outcomes.
Discussion: Although this model of practice relationships was developed from data collected in primary care practices, which differ from other HCOs in some important ways, the ideas that quality is emergent and that relationships influence quality of care are universally important for all HCOs and all medical specialties.
Figures
Comment in
-
Why healing relationships matter in primary care practice.Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009 Sep;35(9):456, 437. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(09)35063-1. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009. PMID: 19769205
References
-
- Plsek P Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001. Appendix B. Redesigning health care with insights from the science of complex adaptive systems; pp. 309–322.
-
- Miller WL, et al. Understanding change in primary care practice using complexity theory. J Fam Pract. 1998;46:369–376. - PubMed
-
- Stroebel CK, et al. Using complexity science to inform a reflective practice for improvement in primary care. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2005 Aug;31:438–446. - PubMed
-
- Miller WL, et al. Practice jazz: Understanding variation in family practice using complexity science. J Fam Pract. 2001 Oct;50:872–878. - PubMed
-
- Tallia AF, et al. 7 Characteristics of successful work relationships. Fam Pract Manag. 2006 Jan;13:47–50. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
