Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Sep 22:7:81.
doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-7-81.

A comparison of classification methods for predicting Chronic Fatigue Syndrome based on genetic data

Affiliations

A comparison of classification methods for predicting Chronic Fatigue Syndrome based on genetic data

Lung-Cheng Huang et al. J Transl Med. .

Abstract

Background: In the studies of genomics, it is essential to select a small number of genes that are more significant than the others for the association studies of disease susceptibility. In this work, our goal was to compare computational tools with and without feature selection for predicting chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) using genetic factors such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs).

Methods: We employed the dataset that was original to the previous study by the CDC Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research Group. To uncover relationships between CFS and SNPs, we applied three classification algorithms including naive Bayes, the support vector machine algorithm, and the C4.5 decision tree algorithm. Furthermore, we utilized feature selection methods to identify a subset of influential SNPs. One was the hybrid feature selection approach combining the chi-squared and information-gain methods. The other was the wrapper-based feature selection method.

Results: The naive Bayes model with the wrapper-based approach performed maximally among predictive models to infer the disease susceptibility dealing with the complex relationship between CFS and SNPs.

Conclusion: We demonstrated that our approach is a promising method to assess the associations between CFS and SNPs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Griffith JP, Zarrouf FA. A systematic review of chronic fatigue syndrome: don't assume it's depression. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2008;10:120–128. doi: 10.4088/PCC.v10n0206. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fukuda K, Straus SE, Hickie I, Sharpe MC, Dobbins JG, Komaroff A. The chronic fatigue syndrome: a comprehensive approach to its definition and study. Ann Intern Med. 1994;121:953–959. - PubMed
    1. Afari N, Buchwald D. Chronic fatigue syndrome: a review. Am J Psychiatry. 2003;160:221–236. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.2.221. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Reeves WC, Wagner D, Nisenbaum R, Jones JF, Gurbaxani B, Solomon L, Papanicolaou DA, Unger ER, Vernon SD, Heim C. Chronic fatigue syndrome--a clinically empirical approach to its definition and study. BMC Med. 2005;3:19. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-3-19. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sanders P, Korf J. Neuroaetiology of chronic fatigue syndrome: an overview. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2008;9:165–171. doi: 10.1080/15622970701310971. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types