Predictors of the early introduction of solid foods in infants: results of a cohort study
- PMID: 19772610
- PMCID: PMC2754451
- DOI: 10.1186/1471-2431-9-60
Predictors of the early introduction of solid foods in infants: results of a cohort study
Abstract
Background: The early introduction of solid foods before 4 months of age has been associated with an increased risk of diarrhoea in infancy and a greater risk of wheeze and increased percentage body fat and weight in childhood. The purpose of this study was to identify the level of compliance with national recommendations related to the timing of the introduction of solid foods and to describe the maternal and infant characteristics associated with the timing of the introduction of solids.
Methods: Subjects were 519 participants in the second longitudinal Perth Infant Feeding Study (PIFS II) recruited from two maternity hospitals in Perth, Western Australia in 2002/3. Data collected prior to, or shortly after discharge from hospital, and at 4, 10, 16, 22, 32, 40 and 52 weeks postpartum included timing of the introduction of solid foods and a variety of maternal and infant characteristics associated with the introduction of solid foods. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify those factors associated with the risk of introducing solid foods early, which for the purposes of this study was defined as being before 17 weeks.
Results: The median age of introduction of solid foods was 17.6 weeks. In total, 44% of infants had received solids before 17 weeks and 93% of infants had received their first solids before 26 weeks of age. The strongest independent predictors of the early introduction of solids were young maternal age, mother smoking prior to pregnancy and not fully breastfeeding at 4 weeks postpartum. In general, mothers introduced solids earlier than recommended because they perceived their baby to either need them or be ready for them.
Conclusion: This study showed a high level of non-compliance among Australian mothers with the infant feeding recommendation related to the timing of solids that was current at the time. In order to improve compliance health professionals need to be aware of those groups least likely to comply with recommendations and their reasons for non-compliance. Infant feeding recommendations need to be evidence-based, uniformly supported by professionals and widely, clearly and consistently articulated if higher rates of compliance are to be achieved in the future.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Current practice in the introduction of solid foods for preterm infants.Public Health Nutr. 2020 Jan;23(1):94-101. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019002337. Epub 2019 Sep 24. Public Health Nutr. 2020. PMID: 31547891 Free PMC article.
-
Determinants for early introduction of complementary foods in Australian infants: findings from the HSHK birth cohort study.Nutr J. 2020 Feb 18;19(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12937-020-0528-1. Nutr J. 2020. PMID: 32070350 Free PMC article.
-
Timing of Introduction of Complementary Foods to US Infants, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2009-2014.J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Mar;118(3):464-470. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.10.020. Epub 2018 Jan 4. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018. PMID: 29307590 Free PMC article.
-
Is 6 months still the best for exclusive breastfeeding and introduction of solids? A literature review with consideration to the risk of the development of allergies.Breastfeed Rev. 2009 Jul;17(2):23-31. Breastfeed Rev. 2009. PMID: 19685855 Review.
-
Optimal timing for solids introduction - why are the guidelines always changing?Clin Exp Allergy. 2013 Aug;43(8):826-34. doi: 10.1111/cea.12090. Clin Exp Allergy. 2013. PMID: 23889238 Review.
Cited by
-
Sociodemographic determinants of early weaning: a Finnish birth cohort study in infants with human leucocyte antigen-conferred susceptibility to type 1 diabetes.Public Health Nutr. 2013 Feb;16(2):296-304. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012002595. Epub 2012 May 21. Public Health Nutr. 2013. PMID: 22607723 Free PMC article.
-
Need for early interventions in the prevention of pediatric overweight: a review and upcoming directions.J Obes. 2012;2012:123023. doi: 10.1155/2012/123023. Epub 2012 May 17. J Obes. 2012. PMID: 22675610 Free PMC article.
-
Adherence to complementary feeding recommendations for infants and implications for public health.Public Health Nutr. 2016 Mar;19(4):638-49. doi: 10.1017/S1368980015001433. Epub 2015 May 20. Public Health Nutr. 2016. PMID: 25989814 Free PMC article.
-
Current practice in the introduction of solid foods for preterm infants.Public Health Nutr. 2020 Jan;23(1):94-101. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019002337. Epub 2019 Sep 24. Public Health Nutr. 2020. PMID: 31547891 Free PMC article.
-
Does the early introduction of solids promote obesity?Singapore Med J. 2017 Nov;58(11):626-631. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2017024. Epub 2017 Apr 3. Singapore Med J. 2017. PMID: 28367583 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Prescott SL, Smith P, Tang M, Palmer JS, Sinn J, Hartley SJ, Cormack B, Heine RG, Gibson RA, Makrides M. The importance of early complementary feeding in the development of oral tolerance: Concerns and controversies. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2008;19:375–380. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2008.00718.x. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kramer MS, Kakuma R. The optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding: A systematic review. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical