Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Nov;38(5):775-84.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.01.008. Epub 2009 Sep 23.

A meta-analysis of the relationship between response expectancies and cancer treatment-related side effects

Affiliations
Review

A meta-analysis of the relationship between response expectancies and cancer treatment-related side effects

Stephanie J Sohl et al. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 Nov.

Abstract

Response expectancies, defined as expectations for nonvolitional responses, have been proposed to contribute to the experience of side effects of cancer and its treatment. To statistically evaluate this association, a systematic search of the published literature was conducted, resulting in 14 studies appropriate for meta-analysis. Results revealed a significant (Z=6.58, P<0.001) medium-sized (r=0.36) association between patients' response expectancies for cancer treatment-related side effects and the experience of these side effects. Assessment of response expectancies with reference to the time the treatment-related side effect would occur resulted in larger effect sizes than when such temporal specificity in assessment was not included, Q(1)=10.27, P<0.01. Effect sizes were also moderated by patients' prior experience with cancer treatment, Q(1)=18.91, P=0.001, such that prior experience led to stronger associations between response expectancies and side effects than no prior experience. Relationships between response expectancies and pain, fatigue, nausea, and vomiting were explored. Effect sizes did not differ between side effects, with the exception that the relationship was significantly stronger for pain than for vomiting (P<0.05). Overall, these results support the contribution of response expectancies to cancer treatment-related side effects. Additionally, the results support the conduct of research on interventions to alter response expectancies, with the goal of reducing side effects and improving patient quality of life.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Diagram of study inclusion and exclusion
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Effect sizes and confidence intervals of included studies.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Effect size for each side effect; ***P < 0.001. Note: All values are significantly different than zero.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Effect sizes for types of nausea; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. Note: All values are significantly different than zero. AN = anticipatory nausea, PTN = post-treatment nausea.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. National Institutes of Health National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement: Symptom management in cancer: pain, depression, and fatigue, July 15-17, 2002. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:1110–1114. - PubMed
    1. Colagiuri B, Roscoe JA, Morrow GR, et al. How do patient expectancies, quality of life, and postchemotherapy nausea interrelate? Cancer. 2008;113:654–661. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gupta D, Lis CG, Grutsch JF. The relationship between cancer-related fatigue and patient satisfaction with quality of life in cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007;34:40–47. - PubMed
    1. Park KU. Assessment of change of quality of life in terminally ill patients under cancer pain management using the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in a Korean sample. Oncology. 2008;74:7–12. - PubMed
    1. Jim HS, Andrykowski MA, Munster PN, Jacobsen PB. Physical symptoms/side effects during breast cancer treatment predict posttreatment distress. Ann Behav Med. 2008;34:200–208. - PubMed

Substances