A meta-analysis of the relationship between response expectancies and cancer treatment-related side effects
- PMID: 19775863
- PMCID: PMC2783563
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.01.008
A meta-analysis of the relationship between response expectancies and cancer treatment-related side effects
Abstract
Response expectancies, defined as expectations for nonvolitional responses, have been proposed to contribute to the experience of side effects of cancer and its treatment. To statistically evaluate this association, a systematic search of the published literature was conducted, resulting in 14 studies appropriate for meta-analysis. Results revealed a significant (Z=6.58, P<0.001) medium-sized (r=0.36) association between patients' response expectancies for cancer treatment-related side effects and the experience of these side effects. Assessment of response expectancies with reference to the time the treatment-related side effect would occur resulted in larger effect sizes than when such temporal specificity in assessment was not included, Q(1)=10.27, P<0.01. Effect sizes were also moderated by patients' prior experience with cancer treatment, Q(1)=18.91, P=0.001, such that prior experience led to stronger associations between response expectancies and side effects than no prior experience. Relationships between response expectancies and pain, fatigue, nausea, and vomiting were explored. Effect sizes did not differ between side effects, with the exception that the relationship was significantly stronger for pain than for vomiting (P<0.05). Overall, these results support the contribution of response expectancies to cancer treatment-related side effects. Additionally, the results support the conduct of research on interventions to alter response expectancies, with the goal of reducing side effects and improving patient quality of life.
Figures




Similar articles
-
The relationship between anticipated response and subsequent experience of cancer treatment-related side effects: A meta-analysis comparing effects before and after treatment exposure.Cancer Treat Rev. 2018 Jul;68:86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.06.009. Epub 2018 Jun 15. Cancer Treat Rev. 2018. PMID: 29936015 Review.
-
Cancer Treatment Side Effects: A Meta-analysis of the Relationship Between Response Expectancies and Experience.J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Aug;54(2):245-258.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.03.017. Epub 2017 May 19. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017. PMID: 28533160 Review.
-
Does assessing patients' expectancies about chemotherapy side effects influence their occurrence?J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Aug;46(2):275-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.07.013. Epub 2012 Nov 11. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013. PMID: 23149081 Clinical Trial.
-
Presurgery psychological factors predict pain, nausea, and fatigue one week after breast cancer surgery.J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010 Jun;39(6):1043-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.11.318. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010. PMID: 20538186 Free PMC article.
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Preventing adverse events of chemotherapy for gastrointestinal cancer by educating patients about the nocebo effect: a randomized-controlled trial.BMC Cancer. 2022 Sep 23;22(1):1008. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10089-2. BMC Cancer. 2022. PMID: 36138381 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Psychological predictors of chemotherapy-induced nausea in women with breast cancer: Expectancies and perceived susceptibility.Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2021 Nov;30(6):e13488. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13488. Epub 2021 Jul 29. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2021. PMID: 34323340 Free PMC article.
-
Mining of Textual Health Information from Reddit: Analysis of Chronic Diseases With Extracted Entities and Their Relations.J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jun 13;21(6):e12876. doi: 10.2196/12876. J Med Internet Res. 2019. PMID: 31199327 Free PMC article.
-
Development of a Symptom Management Intervention: Qualitative Feedback From Advanced Lung Cancer Patients and Their Family Caregivers.Cancer Nurs. 2017 Jan/Feb;40(1):66-75. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000350. Cancer Nurs. 2017. PMID: 26925990 Free PMC article.
-
Optimizing expectations to prevent side effects and enhance quality of life in breast cancer patients undergoing endocrine therapy: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.BMC Cancer. 2013 Sep 18;13:426. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-426. BMC Cancer. 2013. PMID: 24047450 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- National Institutes of Health National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement: Symptom management in cancer: pain, depression, and fatigue, July 15-17, 2002. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:1110–1114. - PubMed
-
- Gupta D, Lis CG, Grutsch JF. The relationship between cancer-related fatigue and patient satisfaction with quality of life in cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007;34:40–47. - PubMed
-
- Park KU. Assessment of change of quality of life in terminally ill patients under cancer pain management using the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in a Korean sample. Oncology. 2008;74:7–12. - PubMed
-
- Jim HS, Andrykowski MA, Munster PN, Jacobsen PB. Physical symptoms/side effects during breast cancer treatment predict posttreatment distress. Ann Behav Med. 2008;34:200–208. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources