Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Nov-Dec;19(6):415-24.
doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2009.08.001. Epub 2009 Sep 23.

Repeat mammography screening among unmarried women with and without a disability

Affiliations

Repeat mammography screening among unmarried women with and without a disability

Melissa A Clark et al. Womens Health Issues. 2009 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: Unmarried women with disabilities may be a particularly vulnerable group for underutilization of repeat mammography screening. Our goal was to compare the breast cancer screening experiences of unmarried women with disabilities (WWD) versus women with no disabilities (WND), and determine whether these experiences are associated with adherence to repeat screening.

Methods: We conducted a matched cohort study of 93 WWD and 93 WND to compare mammography experiences by disability status, examine rates of repeat mammography by disability status, and identify factors that are associated with repeat mammography.

Results: WWD were less likely to be on-schedule than WND in univariable (54.8% vs. 71.0%; relative risk, 0.77; 95% confidence limits, 0.61, 0.97), but not multivariable, analyses. In multivariable analyses, there was a significant interaction between disability status and positive experiences as the reasons for returning to the same mammography facility. Among WND, repeat screening ranged from 59% to 86%, depending on the number of positive experiences endorsed (range, 1-5). In contrast, among WWD, screening rates were only 37% among those who did not report any positive experiences and increased to a maximum of 60% regardless of whether women endorsed one to four or all five positive experiences. Severity and type of disability were not associated with repeat screening.

Conclusion: WWD may be less likely than WND to remain on-schedule for mammography. WWD who do not report any positive experiences as reasons for returning to a mammography facility may be at particularly high risk of underutilization of screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial Conflicts of Interest: None

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ahmed NU, Smith GL, Haber G, Belcon MC. Are women with functional limitations at high risk of underutilization of mammography screening? Womens Health Issues. 2009;19(1):79–87. - PubMed
    1. Alexander MT, Kufera JA. Paper presented at the New England SAS Users Group. Baltimore, MD: 2007. Butting heads on matched cohort analysis using SAS software.
    1. American Cancer Society. Guidelines for the Early Detection of Cancer. Retrieved February 26, 2007, from http://www.cancer.org/docroot/PED/content/PED_2_3X_ACS_Cancer_Detection_....
    1. Balluz L, Ahluwalia IB, Murphy W, Mokdad A, Giles W, Harris VB. Surveillance for certain health behaviors among selected local areas--United States, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2002. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2004;53(5):1–100. - PubMed
    1. Banerjee M, George J, Song EY, Roy A, Hryniuk W. Tree-based model for breast cancer prognostication. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(13):2567–2575. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms