Social vigilantism: measuring individual differences in belief superiority and resistance to persuasion
- PMID: 19776422
- DOI: 10.1177/0146167209346170
Social vigilantism: measuring individual differences in belief superiority and resistance to persuasion
Abstract
Social vigilantism (SV) is an enduring individual difference that assesses the tendency of individuals to impress and propagate their "superior" beliefs onto others to correct others' more "ignorant" opinions. After establishing a reliable measure of SV, three studies showed that SV was associated with greater expressions of belief superiority (whether reacting to others holding dissimilar or similar beliefs) and greater resistance to persuasion (via increased rates of counterarguing and greater attitude stability after persuasion appeals) even after controlling for relevant individual differences (narcissism, dogmatism, psychological reactance, and need for cognition), as well as attitude importance and extremity. Thus, SV predicts expressions of belief superiority and resistance to persuasion above and beyond characteristics of the attitude and individual difference variables previously studied in the attitude literature. SV is a meaningful construct in increasing the understanding of persuasion, attitude resistance, and attitude dissemination that can be applied in a variety of psychological domains.
Similar articles
-
Should persuasion be affective or cognitive? The moderating effects of need for affect and need for cognition.Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Jun;34(6):769-78. doi: 10.1177/0146167208314871. Epub 2008 Mar 14. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008. PMID: 18344496
-
Altering category-level beliefs: the impact of level of representation at belief formation and belief disconfirmation.Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 Aug;35(8):1112-25. doi: 10.1177/0146167209336609. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009. PMID: 19592678
-
Right about others, wrong about ourselves? Actual and perceived self-other differences in resistance to persuasion.Br J Soc Psychol. 2004 Dec;43(Pt 4):585-603. doi: 10.1348/0144666042565416. Br J Soc Psychol. 2004. PMID: 15601510
-
Attitude change: persuasion and social influence.Annu Rev Psychol. 2000;51:539-70. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.539. Annu Rev Psychol. 2000. PMID: 10751980 Review.
-
Attitudes and persuasion.Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;57:345-74. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190034. Annu Rev Psychol. 2006. PMID: 16318599 Review.
Cited by
-
Examining the role of moral, emotional, behavioural, and personality factors in predicting online shaming.PLoS One. 2023 Mar 23;18(3):e0279750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279750. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 36952391 Free PMC article.
-
The role of individual differences in resistance to persuasion on memory for political advertisements.Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 9;14:1196209. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1196209. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 37621945 Free PMC article.
-
Moral grandstanding in public discourse: Status-seeking motives as a potential explanatory mechanism in predicting conflict.PLoS One. 2019 Oct 16;14(10):e0223749. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223749. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31618235 Free PMC article.
-
Resistance strategies and attitude certainty in persuasion: bolstering vs. counterarguing.Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 2;14:1191293. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1191293. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 37599755 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources