Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Dec;20(12):1407-11.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-0937-3. Epub 2009 Sep 24.

Pelvic organ support among primiparous women in the first year after childbirth

Collaborators, Affiliations
Comparative Study

Pelvic organ support among primiparous women in the first year after childbirth

Victoria L Handa et al. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009 Dec.

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: This study describes pelvic organ support after childbirth.

Methods: This ancillary analysis of the Childbirth and Pelvic Symptoms Imaging Study compares pelvic organ prolapse quantification 6-12 months after childbirth among three cohorts of primiparous women: vaginal delivery with sphincter tear (n = 106), vaginal delivery without sphincter tear (n = 108), and cesarean without labor (n = 39).

Results: Of participants, 31.2% had stage II support. Prolapse to or beyond the hymen was present in 14% after vaginal delivery with sphincter tear (95% confidence interval 8%, 22%), 15% (9%, 24%) after vaginal delivery without sphincter tear, and 5% (1%, 17%) after cesarean without labor (p = 0.23). A study of 132 women per group would be required for 80% power to test differences between 5% and 15%.

Conclusions: While these data provide insufficient power to dismiss a difference in pelvic organ support between modes of delivery, they add to our understanding of support following childbirth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest Dr. Kenton serves as a consultant for Pfizer; the remaining authors have no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Nygaard I, Bradley C, Brandt D. Pelvic organ prolapse in older women: prevalence and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:489–497. - PubMed
    1. Swift SE. The distribution of pelvic organ support in a population of female subjects seen for routine gynecologic health care. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:277–285. - PubMed
    1. Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, Aragaki A, Barnabei V, McTiernan A. Pelvic organ prolapse in the WHI: gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:1160–1166. - PubMed
    1. Samuelsson EC, Arne Victor FT, Tibblin G, Svardsudd KF. Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:299–305. - PubMed
    1. Handa VL, Garrett E, Hendrix S, Gold E, Robbins J. Progression and remission of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:27–32. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources