Looking back to the future: from the development of the gene concept to toxicogenomics
- PMID: 19778216
- DOI: 10.1080/15376510902855529
Looking back to the future: from the development of the gene concept to toxicogenomics
Abstract
Initial progress in the science of 'genetics' in the first half of the 20th century was mainly driven by studies utilizing mutations and consequent changes in phenotype. The structural and functional nature of the gene was far from being understood. That state of understanding started changing from the 1940s. In the following decades, with the discovery of the double helix followed by the discoveries on gene structure and expression, there was a period when the structural and functional aspects of the gene could be conceived in terms of one entity, the cistron. However, the discovery of intervening sequences caused this unified concept to fall apart, making the gene concept a subject of philosophical debate again. Meanwhile, over time, technological progress in molecular biology had the field forge ahead rapidly, ultimately leading to the sequencing of the human genome and genomes of other species, and giving birth to the science of genomics. Developments in genomics have given rise to certain applied sub-disciplines like pharmacogenomics and toxicogenomics. While the full potential of pharmaco- and toxicogenomics is yet to be harnessed, they nevertheless have had an impact in drug development and safety assessment, such that the future promise of genomics seems achievable. At present, it is a good opportunity to revisit the path from the development of the initial gene concept and the philosophical debate surrounding the meaning of the term 'gene' to the current state of understanding of genes and genomes and their role in health and disease.
Similar articles
-
Pharmacogenomics: historical perspective and current status.Methods Mol Biol. 2005;311:3-15. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-957-5:003. Methods Mol Biol. 2005. PMID: 16100395 Review.
-
What is a gene? - Revisited.Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2010 Dec;41(4):396-406. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2010.10.014. Epub 2010 Nov 9. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2010. PMID: 21112014
-
Who cares about the double helix?Nature. 2003 Apr 24;422(6934):803-4. doi: 10.1038/422803a. Nature. 2003. PMID: 12712169 No abstract available.
-
Historical development of the concept of the gene.J Med Philos. 2002 Jun;27(3):257-86. doi: 10.1076/jmep.27.3.257.2980. J Med Philos. 2002. PMID: 12187434
-
[From infected bandages to genome of the individual].Duodecim. 2003;119(24):2453-9. Duodecim. 2003. PMID: 14870507 Review. Finnish. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Transcriptomic markers meet the real world: finding diagnostic signatures of corticosteroid treatment in commercial beef samples.BMC Vet Res. 2012 Oct 30;8:205. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-8-205. BMC Vet Res. 2012. PMID: 23110699 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources