Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Sep 24:17:47.
doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-17-47.

Critical care in the emergency department: an assessment of the length of stay and invasive procedures performed on critically ill ED patients

Affiliations

Critical care in the emergency department: an assessment of the length of stay and invasive procedures performed on critically ill ED patients

Robert S Green et al. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. .

Abstract

Introduction: Critically ill patients commonly present to the ED and require aggressive resuscitation. Patient transfer to an ICU environment in an expedient manner is considered optimal care. However, this patient population may remain in the ED for prolonged periods of time. The goal of this study is to describe the ED length of stay, and the invasive procedures performed in critically ill ED patients.

Methods: This is a retrospective medical record review of all patients who presented to the study center over a 1 year period. Patient demographic data, in addition to the times of ED presentation and ICU admission were recorded. Invasive procedures performed in the pre-hospital, ED and the initial 24 hours of ICU care were also recorded.

Results: Overall, 178 patients' required direct admission to an ICU from the ED, with a mortality rate of 21.9%. The median LOS in the ED for critically ill patients requiring ICU admission was 4.9 h (mean 6.5 h, range 1.4-28.2 h). Seventy percent of patients (125,178, 70.2%) required endotracheal intubation with the majority (118/125, 94.4%) being performed in the ED (80/125, 64.0%) or the prehospital setting (38/125, 30.4%). Central venous access was obtained in 56/178 patients (31.5%), with 17.9% (10/56) completed in the ED. Similarly, arterial catheters were inserted in 99/178 patients (55.6%) with 14.1% (14/99) inserted in the ED.

Conclusion: Critically ill patients are managed in the emergency department for a significant length of time. Although the majority of airway intervention occurs in the prehospital setting and ED, relatively few patients undergo invasive procedures while in the emergency department.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fromm RE, Jr, Gibbs LR, McCallum WG, Niziol C, Babcock JC, Gueler AC, et al. Critical care in the emergency department: a time-based study. Crit Care Med. 1993;21:970–976. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199307000-00009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lambe S, Washington DL, Fink A, Herbst K, Liu H, Fosse JS, et al. Trends in the use and capacity of California's emergency departments, 1990-1999. Ann Emerg Med. 2002;39:389–396. doi: 10.1067/mem.2002.122433. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McCaig LF, Nawar EW. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2004 emergency department summary. Adv Data. 2006. pp. 1–29. - PubMed
    1. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, Ressler J, Muzzin A, Knoblich B, et al. Early Goal-Directed Therapy in the Treatment of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1368–1377. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa010307. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Trzeciak S, Dellinger RP, Abate NL, Cowan RM, Stauss M, Kilgannon JH, et al. Translating research to clinical practice: a 1-year experience with implementing early goal-directed therapy for septic shock in the emergency department. Chest. 2006;129:225–232. doi: 10.1378/chest.129.2.225. - DOI - PubMed