Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Sep;2(9):821-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.07.003.

Determinants of significant paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve: implantation impact of device and annulus discongruence

Affiliations
Free article

Determinants of significant paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve: implantation impact of device and annulus discongruence

Delphine Détaint et al. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Sep.
Free article

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess prosthesis/annulus discongruence and its impact on the occurrence of significant aortic regurgitation (AR) immediately after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

Background: Paravalvular AR might occur after TAVI, but its determinants remain unclear.

Methods: Comprehensive echocardiographic examinations were performed in 74 patients who underwent TAVI with a balloon expandable device. Congruence between annulus and device was appraised with the cover index: 100 x (prosthesis diameter - transesophageal echocardiography annulus diameter)/prosthesis diameter.

Results: At baseline aortic valve area was 0.67 +/- 0.2 cm(2), and mean gradient was 50 +/- 15 mm Hg. The TAVI used transfemoral approach in 46 patients (62%) and transapical access in 28 (38%). Prosthesis size was 23 mm in 24 patients (34%) and 26 mm in 50 patients (66%). After TAVI, paravalvular AR was absent in 5 patients (7%), graded 1/4 in 53 (72%), 2/4 in 12 (16%), and 3/4 in 4 (5%). Occurrence of AR >or=2/4 was related to greater patient height, larger annulus, and smaller cover index (all p < 0.002) but not to ejection fraction, severity of stenosis, or prosthesis size. AR >or=2/4 was never observed in patients with aortic annulus <22 mm or with a cover index >8%. Significant improvements were observed from the first 20 cases (AR >or=2/4, 40%) to the last 54 (AR >or=2/4, 15%) (p = 0.02). In multivariate analysis, independent predictors of AR >/=2/4 were low cover index (odds ratio: 1.22; per confidence interval: 1.03 to 1.51 per 1% decrease, p = 0.02) and first versus last procedures (odds ratio: 2.24; 95% confidence interval: 1.07 to 5.22, p = 0.03).

Conclusions: Our study shows that the occurrence of AR >or=2/4 is related to prosthesis/annulus discongruence even after adjustment for experience. Hence, to minimize paravalvular AR, appropriate annular measurements and prosthesis sizing are critical.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources