Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 Sep 24;35(6):741-53.
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.09.005.

Transcription dynamics

Affiliations
Review

Transcription dynamics

Gordon L Hager et al. Mol Cell. .

Abstract

All aspects of transcription and its regulation involve dynamic events. The basal transcription machinery and regulatory components are dynamically recruited to their target genes, and dynamic interactions of transcription factors with chromatin--and with each other--play a key role in RNA polymerase assembly, initiation, and elongation. These short-term binding dynamics of transcription factors are superimposed by long-term cyclical behavior of chromatin opening and transcription factor-binding events. Its dynamic nature is not only a fundamental property of the transcription machinery, but it is emerging as an important modulator of physiological processes, particularly in differentiation and development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. TFs Find Their Specific Binding Sites by Random Scanning of the Genome in 3D
A TF (purple) diffuses through the nuclear space and by random collision associates with chromatin. Most encounters are at nontarget sites resulting in highly transient interactions. Occasionally, a specific binding site (orange) is encountered, and prolonged binding occurs. At each encounter a TF might undergo local motion on the chromatin fiber by either sliding along the DNA, hopping locally or by directed, motor driven motion.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Transcription Factor/Template Interactions during Chromatin Remodeling
(A) Local nucleosome reorganization, giving rise to enhanced transcription factor access, is commonly discussed in terms of altered static states. Evidence has been advanced to support several specific mechanisms, including sliding to a new position, octamer displacement, modified octamer structure, and partial octamer dissociation. These modified nucleosome states would in turn accommodate factor binding events not compatible with the unaltered state. (B) A dynamic view of local transitions suggests that remodeling is a continuous process. Remodeling complexes are targeted to specific nucleosomes by a given transcription factor. However, both the remodeling process itself and commensurate binding of a factor are transient events. Constant repetition of this cycle produces a shift in the equilibrium distribution of both the transcription factor and nucleosome components.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Transcription Complex Assembly
(A) Two subcomplexes (blue and red) exhibit dynamic exchange at a promoter template (black line). Assembly of the full complex occurs via random collisions with the template, leading sometimes to nonproductive interactions and occasionally to productive interactions (the simultaneous presence of both subcomplexes). (B) Regulation of dynamic exchange rates can facilitate or inhibit complex formation. Here, binding of the red subcomplex is stabilized by the bracket-shaped molecule (green), leading to a longer dwell time on the promoter template, thereby facilitating assembly of the complex. Alternatively, destabilization of factor binding could also occur, inhibiting assembly (not shown).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Integrated View of Transcription Factor Dynamics
(A) Most factors that have been studied in living cells exchange rapidly, on a time scale of seconds, with their recognition elements in chromatin (“hit-and-run”). The frequency and transient duration of these binding events can also fluctuate on a longer time scale, by a variety of mechanisms. (B) Depicted here are a set of ten abstracted alleles with one binding element. After a transcriptional stimulus, the number of interaction events increases. If this element is sampled across the population by a methodology such as ChIP, more of the events will be captured in a given time. If secondary mechanisms are triggered that decrease the interaction frequency, the ChIP signal will decrease, and an oscillatory process may ensue. However, if real-time residence times could be examined at a specific allele (green circle), one would observe rapid exchange.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aoyagi S, Narlikar G, Zheng C, Sif S, Kingston RE, and Hayes JJ (2002). Nucleosome remodeling by the human SWI/SNF complex requires transient global disruption of histone-DNA interactions. Mol. Cell. Biol 22, 3653–3662. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Araki R, Fukumura R, Sasaki N, Kasama Y, Suzuki N, Takahashi H, Tabata Y, Saito T, and Abe M (2006). More than 40,000 transcripts, including novel and noncoding transcripts, in mouse embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 24, 2522–2528. - PubMed
    1. Auble DT, Wang D, Post KW, and Hahn S (1997). Molecular analysis of the SNF2/SWI2 protein family member MOT1, an ATP-driven enzyme that dissociates TATA-binding protein from DNA. Mol. Cell. Biol 17, 4842–4851. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Azuara V, Perry P, Sauer S, Spivakov M, Jorgensen HF, John RM, Gouti M, Casanova M, Warnes G, Merkenschlager M, and Fisher AG (2006). Chromatin signatures of pluripotent cell lines. Nat. Cell Biol 8, 532–538. - PubMed
    1. Becker PB (2002). Nucleosome sliding: facts and fiction. EMBO J. 21, 4749–4753. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources