Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2010 Mar;55(3):235-246.e4.
doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.07.024. Epub 2009 Sep 23.

Emergency medical services intervals and survival in trauma: assessment of the "golden hour" in a North American prospective cohort

Collaborators, Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Emergency medical services intervals and survival in trauma: assessment of the "golden hour" in a North American prospective cohort

Craig D Newgard et al. Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Mar.

Abstract

Study objective: The first hour after the onset of out-of-hospital traumatic injury is referred to as the "golden hour," yet the relationship between time and outcome remains unclear. We evaluate the association between emergency medical services (EMS) intervals and mortality among trauma patients with field-based physiologic abnormality.

Methods: This was a secondary analysis of an out-of-hospital, prospective cohort registry of adult (aged > or =15 years) trauma patients transported by 146 EMS agencies to 51 Level I and II trauma hospitals in 10 sites across North America from December 1, 2005, through March 31, 2007. Inclusion criteria were systolic blood pressure less than or equal to 90 mm Hg, respiratory rate less than 10 or greater than 29 breaths/min, Glasgow Coma Scale score less than or equal to 12, or advanced airway intervention. The outcome was in-hospital mortality. We evaluated EMS intervals (activation, response, on-scene, transport, and total time) with logistic regression and 2-step instrumental variable models, adjusted for field-based confounders.

Results: There were 3,656 trauma patients available for analysis, of whom 806 (22.0%) died. In multivariable analyses, there was no significant association between time and mortality for any EMS interval: activation (odds ratio [OR] 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95 to 1.05), response (OR 1.00; 95% CI 9.97 to 1.04), on-scene (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.99 to 1.01), transport (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.98 to 1.01), or total EMS time (OR 1.00; 95% CI 0.99 to 1.01). Subgroup and instrumental variable analyses did not qualitatively change these findings.

Conclusion: In this North American sample, there was no association between EMS intervals and mortality among injured patients with physiologic abnormality in the field.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of patients included in the primary analysis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of the total EMS times for 10 sites across North America (n=3656).

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lerner EB, Moscati RM. The golden hour: scientific fact or medical “urban legend”? Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8:758–760. - PubMed
    1. Sampalis JS, Denis R, Lavoie A, et al. Trauma care regionalization: a process-outcome evaluation. J Trauma. 1999;46:565–581. - PubMed
    1. Samplais JS, Lavoie A, Williams JI, et al. Impact of on-site care, prehospital time, and level of in-hospital care on survival in severely injured patients. J Trauma. 1993;34:252–261. - PubMed
    1. Stiell IG, Nesbitt LP, Pickett W, et al. The OPALS major trauma outcome study: impact of advanced life-support on survival and morbidity. CMAJ. 2008;178:1141–1152. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pepe PE, Wyatt CH, Bickell WH, et al. The relationship between total prehospital time and outcome in hypotensive victims of penetrating injuries. Ann Emerg Med. 1987;16:293–297. - PubMed

Publication types