Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 Jan 15;106(2-3):233-6.
doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.09.002. Epub 2009 Sep 23.

Modafinil does not serve as a reinforcer in cocaine abusers

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Modafinil does not serve as a reinforcer in cocaine abusers

Suzanne K Vosburg et al. Drug Alcohol Depend. .

Abstract

The purpose of this double-blind, randomized, outpatient study was to evaluate the reinforcing and subjective effects of modafinil (200, 400, or 600 mg) in cocaine abusers. Twelve participants (2 female, 10 male) completed this study, consisting of 3 blocks of 7 sessions; each block tested a difference dose of modafinil. During the first 2 sessions of each block, participants "sampled" 1 of the doses of modafinil, and placebo. These doses of modafinil and placebo were available for the subsequent five choice sessions of the block. In each choice session, participants had an opportunity to administer active or placebo capsules. Modafinil administration did not differ from placebo administration, and subjective-effects ratings were not systematically altered as a function of modafinil dose. Results suggest that modafinil does not have abuse liability in cocaine abusers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Average number of choices for placebo and modafinil as a function of modafinil dose. There were no differences between placebo and modafinil.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 2A. VAS “Liked Choice” as a function of drug, modafinil dose, and time. There were no differences between placebo and modafinil. Figure 2B. VAS “Would Pay” as a function of drug, modafinil dose, and time. There were no differences between placebo and modafinil. # indicates a +1 hr vs. +4 hr difference in mm, p ≤ 0.01. Figure 2C. Ratings (mm) of VAS “High” as a function of drug, modafinil dose, and time. There were no differences between placebo and modafinil.

References

    1. Abreu ME, Bigelow GE, Fleisher L, Walsh SL. Effect of intravenous injection speed on responses to cocaine and hydromorphone in humans. Psychopharmacology. 2001;154:76–84. - PubMed
    1. Balster RL, Bigelow GE. Guidelines and methodological reviews concerning drug abuse liability assessment. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2003;70:S13–S40. - PubMed
    1. Balster RL, Schuster CR. Fixed-interval schedule of cocaine reinforcement: Effect of dose and infusion duration. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973;20:119–129. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Biederman J, Swanson JM, Wigal SB, Boellner SW, Earl CQ, Lopex FA Modafinil ADHD Study Group. A comparison of once-daily and divided doses of modafinil in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2006;67:727–735. - PubMed
    1. Blackhall L, Petroni G, Shu J, Baum L, Farace E. A pilot study evaluating the safety and efficacy of modafinil for cancer-related fatigue. J Palliat Med. 2009;12:433–439. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms