Post-auricular muscle reflex in the Middle Latency Evoked Auditory Response
- PMID: 19784429
- PMCID: PMC9446047
- DOI: 10.1016/s1808-8694(15)30499-7
Post-auricular muscle reflex in the Middle Latency Evoked Auditory Response
Abstract
The Middle Latency Auditory Evoked Response may be influenced by the post-auricular muscle reflex which occurs at the same latency of this potential.
Aim: to evaluate the muscle reflex influence on the middle latency response, identifying the most appropriate place for response recording.
Materials and methods: Prospective study in which 40 normal hearing individuals, ranging in age from 18 to 40 years old, were assessed by Middle Latency Response with electrodes placed first on the mastoids, and then on the earlobes.
Results: significant statistical differences were seen between the values found with electrodes placed on the mastoids and on the earlobes concerning the Na-Pa amplitude in C3/A1, C3/A2 and C4/A2, concerning the Na wave latency in C3/A2 and C4/A2, and concerning the Pa wave latency in C3/A1 and C3/A2. We found a higher occurrence of the post-auricular reflex when the electrode was placed on the mastoids, in all studied modalities.
Conclusion: there was post-auricular muscle reflex interference upon the Middle Latency Response obtained when the electrodes were placed on the mastoid, and the most efficient electrode disposition in order to capture and to register more accurately this potential was on the earlobe.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Middle latency response study of auditory evoked potentials amplitudes and lantencies audiologically normal individuals.Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 Jan-Feb;73(1):69-74. doi: 10.1016/s1808-8694(15)31125-3. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2007. PMID: 17505602 Free PMC article.
-
[Middle and late latency auditory evoked potentials in adults with AIDS].Pro Fono. 2006 May-Aug;18(2):171-6. doi: 10.1590/s0104-56872006000200006. Pro Fono. 2006. PMID: 16927622 Portuguese.
-
Are chirps better than clicks and tonebursts for evoking middle latency responses?J Am Acad Audiol. 2014 Jun;25(6):576-83. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.25.6.7. J Am Acad Audiol. 2014. PMID: 25313547
-
Comparing middle latency response with and without music.Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2006 Jul-Aug;72(4):465-9. doi: 10.1016/s1808-8694(15)30991-5. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2006. PMID: 17143424 Free PMC article.
-
[Effects of monaural and binaural stimulation on middle latency auditory evoked responses].Rev Neurol. 2000 Jul 1-15;31(1):17-20. Rev Neurol. 2000. PMID: 10948576 Spanish.
Cited by
-
From vestibular implant to cortex: electrically evoked vestibular responses.J Neurol. 2025 May 29;272(6):430. doi: 10.1007/s00415-025-13158-1. J Neurol. 2025. PMID: 40442486 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Geisler CD, Frikshop LS, Rosemblith WA. Extracranial responses to acoustic clicks in man. Science. 1958;128:1210–1211. - PubMed
-
- Chermak G, Musiek FE. Central auditory processing. Singular Publishing Press; San Diego: 1997.
-
- Kraus N, Kileny P, McGee T. In: Handbook of Clinical Audiology. Katz J, editor. Williams & Wilkins; Baltimore: 1994. Middle Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials; pp. 387–402.
-
- Musiek FE, Geurkink N. Auditory Brainstem and Middle Latency Evoked Response Sensitivity Near Threshold. Ann Otol Rhinol Laringol. 1981;90:236–240. - PubMed
-
- Musiek FE, Geurkink NA, Keitel S. Test battery assessment of auditory perceptual dysfunction in children. Laryngoscope. 1982;92:251–257. - PubMed
Uncited Reference
-
- Carvallo RMM, Carvalho M, Ishida IM. Auditory profile in individuals with and without CAPD. Proceedings of the 12th Annual Convention E Exposition of The American Academy of Audiology; 2000; Chicago, USA.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous