The neurobiology of deception: evidence from neuroimaging and loss-of-function studies
- PMID: 19786872
- DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e328332c3cf
The neurobiology of deception: evidence from neuroimaging and loss-of-function studies
Abstract
Purpose of review: Visualization of how the brain generates a lie is now possible because of recent conceptual and technical advances in functional neuroimaging; this has led to a rapid increase in studies related to the cognitive neuroscience of deception. The present review summarizes recent work on the neural substrates that underlie human deceptive behavior.
Recent findings: Functional neuroimaging studies in healthy individuals have revealed that the prefrontal cortex plays a predominant role in deception. In addition, recent evidence obtained from loss-of-function studies with neuropsychological investigation and transcranial direct current stimulation has demonstrated the functional contribution of the prefrontal cortex to deception. Other research into the relationship between deception and the brain has focused on the potential use of functional MRI for lie detection, neural correlates of pathological lying, and brain mechanisms underlying inference of deceit by others.
Summary: Converging evidence from multiple sources suggests that the prefrontal cortex organizes the processes of inhibiting true responses and making deceptive responses. The neural mechanisms underlying various other aspects of deception are also gradually being delineated, although the findings are diverse, and further study is needed. These studies represent an important step toward a neural explanation of complex human deceptive behavior.
Similar articles
-
Deceiving others: distinct neural responses of the prefrontal cortex and amygdala in simple fabrication and deception with social interactions.J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Feb;19(2):287-95. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.2.287. J Cogn Neurosci. 2007. PMID: 17280517
-
How the brain shapes deception: an integrated review of the literature.Neuroscientist. 2011 Oct;17(5):560-74. doi: 10.1177/1073858410393359. Epub 2011 Mar 30. Neuroscientist. 2011. PMID: 21454323 Review.
-
The contribution of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex to the preparation for deception and truth-telling.Brain Res. 2012 Jun 29;1464:43-52. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.05.004. Epub 2012 May 9. Brain Res. 2012. PMID: 22580084
-
Effect of prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation on spontaneous truth-telling.Behav Brain Res. 2011 Nov 20;225(1):209-14. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.07.028. Epub 2011 Jul 22. Behav Brain Res. 2011. PMID: 21807030
-
Non-invasive brain stimulation in the detection of deception: scientific challenges and ethical consequences.Behav Sci Law. 2009 Mar-Apr;27(2):191-208. doi: 10.1002/bsl.860. Behav Sci Law. 2009. PMID: 19266592 Review.
Cited by
-
Hemodynamic Pattern Recognition During Deception Process Using Functional Near-infrared Spectroscopy.J Med Biol Eng. 2016;36:22-31. doi: 10.1007/s40846-016-0103-6. Epub 2016 Mar 10. J Med Biol Eng. 2016. PMID: 27065764 Free PMC article.
-
The "good cop, bad cop" effect in the RT-based concealed information test: exploring the effect of emotional expressions displayed by a virtual investigator.PLoS One. 2015 Feb 20;10(2):e0116087. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116087. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 25699516 Free PMC article.
-
Lying about the valence of affective pictures: an fMRI study.PLoS One. 2010 Aug 25;5(8):e12291. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012291. PLoS One. 2010. PMID: 20811624 Free PMC article.
-
Functional neural networks of honesty and dishonesty in children: Evidence from graph theory analysis.Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 21;7(1):12085. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11754-4. Sci Rep. 2017. PMID: 28935904 Free PMC article.
-
Neural alignment during face-to-face spontaneous deception: Does gender make a difference?Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Dec;41(17):4964-4981. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25173. Epub 2020 Aug 18. Hum Brain Mapp. 2020. PMID: 32808714 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials