Considering usual medical care in clinical trial design
- PMID: 19787044
- PMCID: PMC2746285
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000111
Considering usual medical care in clinical trial design
Abstract
Liza Dawson and colleagues discuss the scientific and ethical issues associated with choosing clinical trial designs when there is no consensus on what constitutes usual care.
Conflict of interest statement
DZ is employed by the National Institutes of Health as a senior scientist, and the Director, ClinicalTrials.gov. She has no other relevant interests. LMF is now retired but was an employee of the NIH institute (the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute) that funded the ARDS Network, and was a senior-level NHLBI employee at the time of the controversy regarding the ARDSNet study that stimulated the conference discussed in the paper.
References
-
- The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network. Pulmonary-artery versus central venous catheter to guide treatment of acute lung injury. New Engl J Med. 2006;354:2213–2224. - PubMed
-
- The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network. Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury. New Engl J Med. 2006;354:2564–2575. - PubMed
-
- Freedman B. Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research. New Engl J Med. 1987;317:141–5. - PubMed
-
- Schwartz D, Lellouch J. Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. J Chronic Dis. 1967;20:637–648. - PubMed
-
- Sackett DL. Clinical Epidemiology: How to Do Clinical Practice Research. 3rd edition. Lippincott, Williams, Wilkins; 2006. The Principles behind the tactics of performing therapeutic trials.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
