Analysis of risk factors for central venous port failure in cancer patients
- PMID: 19787834
- PMCID: PMC2754519
- DOI: 10.3748/wjg.15.4709
Analysis of risk factors for central venous port failure in cancer patients
Abstract
Aim: To analyze the risk factors for central port failure in cancer patients administered chemotherapy, using univariate and multivariate analyses.
Methods: A total of 1348 totally implantable venous access devices (TIVADs) were implanted into 1280 cancer patients in this cohort study. A Cox proportional hazard model was applied to analyze risk factors for failure of TIVADs. Log-rank test was used to compare actuarial survival rates. Infection, thrombosis, and surgical complication rates (chi(2) test or Fisher's exact test) were compared in relation to the risk factors.
Results: Increasing age, male gender and open-ended catheter use were significant risk factors reducing survival of TIVADs as determined by univariate and multivariate analyses. Hematogenous malignancy decreased the survival time of TIVADs; this reduction was not statistically significant by univariate analysis [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.336, 95% CI: 0.966-1.849, P = 0.080)]. However, it became a significant risk factor by multivariate analysis (HR = 1.499, 95% CI: 1.079-2.083, P = 0.016) when correlated with variables of age, sex and catheter type. Close-ended (Groshong) catheters had a lower thrombosis rate than open-ended catheters (2.5% vs 5%, P = 0.015). Hematogenous malignancy had higher infection rates than solid malignancy (10.5% vs 2.5%, P < 0.001).
Conclusion: Increasing age, male gender, open-ended catheters and hematogenous malignancy were risk factors for TIVAD failure. Close-ended catheters had lower thrombosis rates and hematogenous malignancy had higher infection rates.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Assessing the time-to-removal of totally implantable venous access devices comparing valved-versus open-ended catheters in patients treated with chemotherapy.J Vasc Access. 2025 Mar;26(2):447-454. doi: 10.1177/11297298231223539. Epub 2024 Jan 11. J Vasc Access. 2025. PMID: 38205615
-
Comparisons of outcomes and survivals for two central venous access port systems.J Surg Oncol. 2005 Jul 1;91(1):61-6. doi: 10.1002/jso.20264. J Surg Oncol. 2005. PMID: 15999349
-
A randomized, prospective trial of central venous ports connected to standard open-ended or Groshong catheters in adult oncology patients.Cancer. 2001 Sep 1;92(5):1204-12. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010901)92:5<1204::aid-cncr1439>3.0.co;2-9. Cancer. 2001. PMID: 11571734 Clinical Trial.
-
The mystery of the occluded port that allowed blood withdrawal: is it safe to use standard needles to access ports? A case report and literature review.J Surg Oncol. 2014 Apr;109(5):500-3. doi: 10.1002/jso.23508. Epub 2013 Dec 6. J Surg Oncol. 2014. PMID: 24310214 Review.
-
Increased use of percutaneous technique for totally implantable venous access devices. Is it real progress? A 27-year comprehensive review on early complications.Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Jun;17(6):1649-56. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1005-4. Epub 2010 Mar 5. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010. PMID: 20204533 Review.
Cited by
-
Applicability of TIVAP versus PICC in non-hematological malignancies patients: A meta-analysis and systematic review.PLoS One. 2021 Aug 3;16(8):e0255473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255473. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34343193 Free PMC article.
-
The correlation between subcutaneous fat thickness and the incidence of chemoport-related infection.Infect Prev Pract. 2024 Dec 5;7(1):100433. doi: 10.1016/j.infpip.2024.100433. eCollection 2025 Mar. Infect Prev Pract. 2024. PMID: 39758681 Free PMC article.
-
Totally implantable venous access port systems and associated complications: A single-institution retrospective analysis of 2,996 breast cancer patients.Mol Clin Oncol. 2016 Mar;4(3):456-460. doi: 10.3892/mco.2016.726. Epub 2016 Jan 7. Mol Clin Oncol. 2016. PMID: 26998304 Free PMC article.
-
Cephalic vein approach for the implantable central venous access: A retrospective review of the single institution's experiences; Cohort Study.Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov;98(46):e18007. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018007. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019. PMID: 31725671 Free PMC article.
-
Central venous port implantations via the cephalic vein applying an intravasal electrographic control of the catheter tip position: a single-center experience of 316 cases.World J Urol. 2012 Jun;30(3):399-404. doi: 10.1007/s00345-011-0752-6. Epub 2011 Aug 28. World J Urol. 2012. PMID: 21874511
References
-
- Broviac JW, Cole JJ, Scribner BH. A silicone rubber atrial catheter for prolonged parenteral alimentation. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1973;136:602–606. - PubMed
-
- Hickman RO, Buckner CD, Clift RA, Sanders JE, Stewart P, Thomas ED. A modified right atrial catheter for access to the venous system in marrow transplant recipients. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1979;148:871–875. - PubMed
-
- Niederhuber JE, Ensminger W, Gyves JW, Liepman M, Doan K, Cozzi E. Totally implanted venous and arterial access system to replace external catheters in cancer treatment. Surgery. 1982;92:706–712. - PubMed
-
- Biffi R, Corrado F, de Braud F, de Lucia F, Scarpa D, Testori A, Orsi F, Bellomi M, Mauri S, Aapro M, et al. Long-term, totally implantable central venous access ports connected to a Groshong catheter for chemotherapy of solid tumours: experience from 178 cases using a single type of device. Eur J Cancer. 1997;33:1190–1194. - PubMed
-
- Biffi R, De Braud F, Orsi F, Pozzi S, Arnaldi P, Goldhirsch A, Rotmensz N, Robertson C, Bellomi M, Andreoni B. A randomized, prospective trial of central venous ports connected to standard open-ended or Groshong catheters in adult oncology patients. Cancer. 2001;92:1204–1212. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources