Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Sep 29:9:160.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-9-160.

Small islands and pandemic influenza: potential benefits and limitations of travel volume reduction as a border control measure

Affiliations

Small islands and pandemic influenza: potential benefits and limitations of travel volume reduction as a border control measure

Martin Eichner et al. BMC Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Some island nations have explicit components of their influenza pandemic plans for providing travel warnings and restricting incoming travellers. But the potential value of such restrictions has not been quantified.

Methods: We developed a probabilistic model and used parameters from a published model (i.e., InfluSim) and travel data from Pacific Island Countries and Territories (PICTs).

Results: The results indicate that of the 17 PICTs with travel data, only six would be likely to escape a major pandemic with a viral strain of relatively low contagiousness (i.e., for R0 = 1.5) even when imposing very tight travel volume reductions of 99% throughout the course of the pandemic. For a more contagious viral strain (R0 = 2.25) only five PICTs would have a probability of over 50% to escape. The total number of travellers during the pandemic must not exceed 115 (for R0 = 3.0) or 380 (for R0 = 1.5) if a PICT aims to keep the probability of pandemic arrival below 50%.

Conclusion: These results suggest that relatively few island nations could successfully rely on intensive travel volume restrictions alone to avoid the arrival of pandemic influenza (or subsequent waves). Therefore most island nations may need to plan for multiple additional interventions (e.g., screening and quarantine) to raise the probability of remaining pandemic free or achieving substantial delay in pandemic arrival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Probability to escape a major epidemic by number of visitors arriving on a PICT during the pandemic period.

References

    1. Berro A, Gallagher N, Yanni E, Lipman H, Whatley A, Bossak B, Murphy R, Pezzi C. World Health Organization (WHO) travel recommendations during the 2003 SARS outbreak: Lessons learned for mitigating pandemic influenza and globally emerging infectious diseases [Poster presentation] Atlanta International Conference on Emerging Infectious Diseases (ICEID); 2008.
    1. Ministry of Health. New Zealand Influenza Pandemic Action Plan. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2006.
    1. McLeod M, Kelly H, Wilson N, Baker MG. Border control measures in the influenza pandemic plans of six South Pacific nations: a critical review. N Z Med J. 2008;121(1278):62–72. - PubMed
    1. Epstein JM, Goedecke DM, Yu F, Morris RJ, Wagener DK, Bobashev GV. Controlling pandemic flu: the value of international air travel restrictions. PLoS ONE. 2007;2:e401. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000401. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bell DM. World Health Organization Writing Group. Non-pharmaceutical interventions for pandemic influenza, international measures. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:81–87. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types