An evaluation of the sensitivity of acute flaccid paralysis surveillance for poliovirus infection in Australia
- PMID: 19788763
- PMCID: PMC2761398
- DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-9-162
An evaluation of the sensitivity of acute flaccid paralysis surveillance for poliovirus infection in Australia
Abstract
Background: World Health Organization (WHO) targets for acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) surveillance, including the notification of a minimum rate of AFP among children, are used to assess the adequacy of AFP surveillance for the detection of poliovirus infection. Sensitive surveillance for poliovirus infection in both developed and developing countries is essential to support global disease eradication efforts. We applied recently developed methods for the quantitative evaluation of disease surveillance systems to evaluate the sensitivity of AFP surveillance for poliovirus infection in Australia.
Methods: A scenario tree model which accounted for administrative region, age, population immunity, the likelihood of AFP, and the probability of notification and stool sampling was used to assess the sensitivity of AFP surveillance for wild poliovirus infection among children aged less than 15 years in Australia. The analysis was based on historical surveillance data collected between 2000 and 2005. We used a surveillance time period of one month, and evaluated the ability of the surveillance system to detect poliovirus infection at a prevalence of 1 case per 100 000 persons and 1 case per million persons.
Results: There was considerable variation in the sensitivity of AFP surveillance for poliovirus infection among Australian States and Territories. The estimated median sensitivity of AFP surveillance in Australia among children aged less than 15 years was 8.2% per month at a prevalence of 1 case per 100,000 population, and 0.9% per month at a prevalence of 1 case per million population. The probability that Australia is free from poliovirus infection given negative surveillance findings following 5 years of continuous surveillance was 96.9% at a prevalence of 1 case per 100,000 persons and 56.5% at a prevalence of 1 case per million persons.
Conclusion: Given the ongoing risk of poliovirus importation prior to global eradication, long term surveillance is required to provide a high degree of confidence in freedom from poliovirus infection in Australia, particularly if a low prevalence of infection is assumed. Adherence to the WHO surveillance targets would considerably improve the sensitivity of surveillance for poliovirus infection in Australia.
Figures
References
-
- Global polio eradication initiative annual report 2007: Impact of the intensified eradication effort. http://www.polioeradication.org/content/publications/AnnualReport2007_En...
-
- Progress toward interruption of wild poliovirus transmission--worldwide, January 2005-March 2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006;55(16):458–462. - PubMed
-
- World Health Organisation. Conclusions and recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Poliomyelitis Eradication, November 2008. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2009;84(3):17–28. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
