Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Sep 18;103(12):128101.
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.128101. Epub 2009 Sep 17.

Magnetic wire traps and programmable manipulation of biological cells

Affiliations

Magnetic wire traps and programmable manipulation of biological cells

G Vieira et al. Phys Rev Lett. .

Abstract

We present a multiplex method, based on microscopic programmable magnetic traps in zigzag wires patterned on a platform, to simultaneously apply directed forces on multiple fluid-borne cells or biologically inert magnetic microparticles or nanoparticles. The gentle tunable forces do not produce damage and retain cell viability. The technique is demonstrated with T-lymphocyte cells remotely manipulated (by a joystick) along desired trajectories on a silicon surface with average speeds up to 20 microm/s.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Schematic of a rectangular zigzag wire with a head-to-head (HH) domain wall (DW) at the vertex, associated field HDW, and a trapped magnetic particle (gray circle). (b) Array of zigzag wires patterned on platform with perpendicular (Hz) and in-plane (H//) magnetic fields. Sketch in (a) is an enlarged view of the dotted circle around a vertex. (c) Schematic of electromagnets and coil to create H// and Hz. Cell movement observed by optical microscope (Reichert) with 20× objective lens and high speed camera. (d) Image of superparamagnetic spheres (2.8 μm diameter, dark circles) selectively attracted from solution and trapped only at HH and TT (tail-to-tail) domain walls under no external fields. The FeCo wires patterned on Si are 2 μm wide, 40 nm thick with 16 μm between adjacent vertices.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Calculated field gradient, force and energy profiles from a 1000 nm wide domain wall localized on a 40 nm thick, 1 μm wide FeCo wire. (a) Magnetic field gradients above the wire based on “point charge” (solid line) model and OOMMF simulations (dashed line) increase rapidly above 104 T/m as distance z to the domain wall decreases. (b) Variation of axial force Fz determined from “point charge' model on a magnetic bead (χ = 0.85) lying 1.42 μm above domain wall with external field Hz. (c)–(f) potential energy profiles transform from attractive (c, d, e) to repulsive (f) by changing Hz further negative. Calculated maximum force Fxmax along length of wire shows its tunability with Hz. Note for distances z >1300 nm relevant to this study, the magnetic energies are not sensitive to the precise magnetization profiles within the domain wall.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) Sequential applications of planar (H//) and perpendicular (HZ) fields transport (indicated by dots) a microsphere on a Si platform along a zigzag wire. (b) Transport of several T-lymphocyte cells along the wires. The cells (dashed circles in top panel) are conjugated to 1 μm magnetic spheres. (c) Trajectory (white dots) of a single T-lymphocyte cell away from the wires and its controlled return to a neighboring vertex on the same wire. The arrows (and dashed circle in first panel) identify the cell. (d) Simultaneous back and forth transport of five fluid borne T-cells between zigzag wire (1) (2) and (3). Dots identify trajectory of five cells.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a) Orientation of a zigzag wire, magnetization M (open arrows), and external H//, HZ fields. (b) – (f) Variation of magnetic potential energy within “point charge” model with distance d from the HH vertex along the wire. Orientations of H// and Hz are indicated. Inset photographs show close correlation between locations of a microsphere with a diameter of 2.8 μm on the wire and the calculated local energy minimum position.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Neuman KC, Nagy A. Nature Methods. 2008;5:491–505. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Neuman KC, Lionnet T, Allemand JF. Annu Rev Mater Res. 2007;37:33–67.
    1. Strick T, Allemand JF, Croquette V, Bensimon D. Physics Today. 2001;54:46–51.
    1. Safarik I, Safarikova M. J Chromatogr B. 1999;722:33–53. - PubMed
    1. Zlatanova J, Lindsay SM, Leuba SH. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2000;74:37–61. - PubMed

Publication types