Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Dec;38(6):390-6.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0684.2009.00385.x. Epub 2009 Sep 28.

Evaluation of four hematology and a chemistry portable benchtop analyzers using non-human primate blood

C L Snider  1 , E J Dick Jr, D L McGlasson, M C Robbins, R L Sholund, Y R Bommineni, G B Hubbard
Affiliations

Evaluation of four hematology and a chemistry portable benchtop analyzers using non-human primate blood

C L Snider et al. J Med Primatol. 2009 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Near patient testing (NPT) and point-of-care testing (POCT) using portable benchtop analyzers has become necessary in many areas of the medical community, including biocontainment.

Methods: We evaluated the Beckman AcT diff, Abaxis Vetscan HMII (two instruments), Abbott Cell-Dyn 1800, and Abaxis Vetscan VS2 for within-run precision and correlation to central laboratory instruments using non-human primates blood.

Results: Compared with the central laboratory instruments, the Beckman AcT diff correlated on 80%; the HMII instruments on 31% and 44%, the CD1800 on 31%, and the VS2 on 71% of assays. For assays with published manufacturers precision guidelines, the AcT diff met all nine, the HMII instruments met one and six of six, and the CD 1800 met one of six.

Conclusions: Laboratories using NPT/POCT must test their individual instruments for precision and correlation, identify assays that are reliable, and exclude or develop supplemental procedures for assays that are not.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Büttner J, Borth R, Boutwell JH, Broughton PM, Bowyer RC. International Federation of Clinical Chemistry. Committee on Standards. Expert Panel on Nomenclature and Principles of Quality Control in Clinical Chemistry. Approved recommendation (1978) on quality control in clinical chemistry. Part 1. General principles and terminology. Clin Chim Acta. 1979;98(1-2):129F–143F. - PubMed
    1. Department of Health and Human Services Federal Register (42 CFR Part 493) 2004
    1. Grieve R, Beech R, Vincent J, Mazurkiewicz J. Near patient testing in diabetes clinics: appraising the costs and outcomes. Health Technol Assess. 1999;3(15):1–74. - PubMed
    1. Grosenbaugh DA, Gadawski JE, Muir WW. Evaluation of a portable clinical analyzer in a veterinary hospital setting. JAVMA. 1998;213(5):691–4. - PubMed
    1. Hicks JM, Losefsohn M, Greenberg L. A Comparison of Three Desktop Chemistry Analyzers for the Pediatric Practice. Clin Pediatr. 1991;30(4):217–24. - PubMed

Publication types