Survival and failure rates of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices: a systematic review
- PMID: 19793320
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01754.x
Survival and failure rates of orthodontic temporary anchorage devices: a systematic review
Abstract
Aim: The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature on the survival rates of palatal implants, Onplants((R)), miniplates and mini screws.
Material and methods: An electronic MEDLINE search supplemented by manual searching was conducted to identify randomized clinical trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies on palatal implants, Onplants((R)), miniplates and miniscrews with a mean follow-up time of at least 12 weeks and of at least 10 units per modality having been examined clinically at a follow-up visit. Assessment of studies and data abstraction was performed independently by two reviewers. Reported failures of used devices were analyzed using random-effects Poisson regression models to obtain summary estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of failure and survival proportions.
Results: The search up to January 2009 provided 390 titles and 71 abstracts with full-text analysis of 34 articles, yielding 27 studies that met the inclusion criteria. In meta-analysis, the failure rate for Onplants((R)) was 17.2% (95% CI: 5.9-35.8%), 10.5% for palatal implants (95% CI: 6.1-18.1%), 16.4% for miniscrews (95% CI: 13.4-20.1%) and 7.3% for miniplates (95% CI: 5.4-9.9%). Miniplates and palatal implants, representing torque-resisting temporary anchorage devices (TADs), when grouped together, showed a 1.92-fold (95% CI: 1.06-2.78) lower clinical failure rate than miniscrews.
Conclusion: Based on the available evidence in the literature, palatal implants and miniplates showed comparable survival rates of >or=90% over a period of at least 12 weeks, and yielded superior survival than miniscrews. Palatal implants and miniplates for temporary anchorage provide reliable absolute orthodontic anchorage. If the intended orthodontic treatment would require multiple miniscrew placement to provide adequate anchorage, the reliability of such systems is questionable. For patients who are undergoing extensive orthodontic treatment, force vectors may need to be varied or the roots of the teeth to be moved may need to slide past the anchors. In this context, palatal implants or miniplates should be the TADs of choice.
Similar articles
-
Reinforcement of anchorage during orthodontic brace treatment with implants or other surgical methods.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(3):CD005098. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005098.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 19;(8):CD005098. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005098.pub3. PMID: 17636785 Updated.
-
A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. II. Combined tooth--implant-supported FPDs.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Dec;15(6):643-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01118.x. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004. PMID: 15533125
-
A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part I: Single crowns.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Jun;18 Suppl 3:73-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01467.x. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007. PMID: 17594372
-
A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 6:22-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02546.x. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012. PMID: 23062125
-
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 12065068
Cited by
-
Effectiveness of anchorage with temporary anchorage devices during anterior maxillary tooth retraction: A randomized clinical trial.Korean J Orthod. 2019 Sep;49(5):279-285. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2019.49.5.279. Epub 2019 Sep 24. Korean J Orthod. 2019. PMID: 31598484 Free PMC article.
-
Osteocyte Mechanotransduction in Orthodontic Tooth Movement.Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2023 Dec;21(6):731-742. doi: 10.1007/s11914-023-00826-2. Epub 2023 Oct 4. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2023. PMID: 37792246 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effectiveness of methods for detaching orthodontic implants likely to fracture upon rotational torque - an animal study.Clin Exp Dent Res. 2016 Feb 9;2(1):51-56. doi: 10.1002/cre2.20. eCollection 2016 Jun. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2016. PMID: 29744149 Free PMC article.
-
A Novel Rat Model of Orthodontic Tooth Movement Using Temporary Skeletal Anchorage Devices: 3D Finite Element Analysis and In Vivo Validation.Int J Dent. 2014;2014:917535. doi: 10.1155/2014/917535. Epub 2014 Sep 10. Int J Dent. 2014. PMID: 25295060 Free PMC article.
-
Temporary anchorage device usage: a survey among Swiss orthodontists.Prog Orthod. 2014 Apr 1;15(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s40510-014-0029-x. Prog Orthod. 2014. PMID: 24935644 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous