Event-related potentials in clinical research: guidelines for eliciting, recording, and quantifying mismatch negativity, P300, and N400

Connie C Duncan¹, Robert J Barry², John F Connolly³, Catherine Fischer⁴, Patricia T Michie⁵, Risto Näätänen⁶, John Polich⁷, Ivar Reinvang⁸, Cyma Van Petten⁹

Affiliations

¹ Clinical Psychophysiology and Psychopharmacology Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA. Electronic address: cduncan@usuhs.mil.
² School of Psychology and Brain & Behaviour Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
³ Department of Linguistics and Languages, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont., Canada.
⁴ Hospices Civils de Lyon, Neurological Hospital and INSERM U821, Lyon, France.
⁵ School of Psychology, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
⁶ Department of Psychology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia; Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience (CFIN), University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark; Cognitive Brain Research Unit, Department of Psychology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
⁷ Cognitive Electrophysiology Laboratory, Molecular and Integrative Neurosciences Department, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
⁸ Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
⁹ Department of Psychology, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York, USA.

PMID: 19796989
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.07.045

Free article

Review

Event-related potentials in clinical research: guidelines for eliciting, recording, and quantifying mismatch negativity, P300, and N400

Connie C Duncan et al. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Nov.

Free article

. 2009 Nov;120(11):1883-1908.

doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.07.045. Epub 2009 Sep 30.

Authors

Connie C Duncan¹, Robert J Barry², John F Connolly³, Catherine Fischer⁴, Patricia T Michie⁵, Risto Näätänen⁶, John Polich⁷, Ivar Reinvang⁸, Cyma Van Petten⁹

Affiliations

¹ Clinical Psychophysiology and Psychopharmacology Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA. Electronic address: cduncan@usuhs.mil.
² School of Psychology and Brain & Behaviour Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
³ Department of Linguistics and Languages, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont., Canada.
⁴ Hospices Civils de Lyon, Neurological Hospital and INSERM U821, Lyon, France.
⁵ School of Psychology, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
⁶ Department of Psychology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia; Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience (CFIN), University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark; Cognitive Brain Research Unit, Department of Psychology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
⁷ Cognitive Electrophysiology Laboratory, Molecular and Integrative Neurosciences Department, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
⁸ Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
⁹ Department of Psychology, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York, USA.

PMID: 19796989
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.07.045

Abstract

This paper describes recommended methods for the use of event-related brain potentials (ERPs) in clinical research and reviews applications to a variety of psychiatric and neurological disorders. Techniques are presented for eliciting, recording, and quantifying three major cognitive components with confirmed clinical utility: mismatch negativity (MMN), P300, and N400. Also highlighted are applications of each of the components as methods of investigating central nervous system pathology. The guidelines are intended to assist investigators who use ERPs in clinical research, in an effort to provide clear and concise recommendations and thereby to standardize methodology and facilitate comparability of data across laboratories.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Clinical ERPs: from consternation toward elucidation.
Coburn KL. Coburn KL. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Nov;120(11):1877-1878. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.07.046. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009. PMID: 19836994 No abstract available.

Publication types

Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
- The Lens - Patent Citations Database
Medical
- ClinicalTrials.gov
Miscellaneous
- NCI CPTAC Assay Portal

Save citation to file

Email citation

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search

Create a file for external citation management software

Your RSS Feed

Event-related potentials in clinical research: guidelines for eliciting, recording, and quantifying mismatch negativity, P300, and N400

Affiliations

Event-related potentials in clinical research: guidelines for eliciting, recording, and quantifying mismatch negativity, P300, and N400

Authors

Affiliations

Abstract

Comment in

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources

Other Literature Sources

Medical

Miscellaneous